• Breve
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      The legal system is the perfect place for working out nuanced issues like this.

      If I were a lawyer and making this lawsuit I would argue that “publicly available” does not mean “public domain”, and that without acquiring usage rights for the data then you don’t have the right to use the data.

      If the courts rule against a decision like this then that would mean that any website that hosts any materials that can be accessed without an account must then provide that material to any person who accesses it free of charge which is a gigantic consequence to this nuanced issue.

      • Breve
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          A data set isn’t like a photocopier in any meaningful way.

          It’s not a tool, it’s information, and some of it counts as personal data under EU data protection laws.