• JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But they’re a whole lot better for the planet than gas cars. And cars won’t go away till we make alternatives. Which we should do as quickly as possible, but will still take a while.

      • excitingburp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        … so long as you’re not leasing them, the lifetime energy cost is night and day.

        The current rhetoric against EVs is reminiscent of the rhetoric against nuclear power. Yes, it’s not great. Yes, it’s not renewable. However, it gives us more time to more deeply address these issues. The successful anti-nuclear Green Peace campaigns against nuclear have done immeasurable damage to the environment in the long-term (I’m now convinced they were a big oil sock puppet all along). The same could be said for the anti-EV crowd, but the “EVs are sexy” campaign seems to be gaining more traction this time round.

        Make no mistake though, the “EVs are just as bad” is a myth perpetuated by big oil.

        If you can do a bike, then please do a bike (or a scooter, or one of the many options). If you can’t, then an EV is a good choice. If you can’t afford an EV. But never, ever, lease.

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          ??? I hugely disagree that cars are a bigger problem than green house gas pollution. I can live in an unwalkable city. I probably can’t live on a +4°C earth.

            • DeprecatedCompatV2@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I usually visit my closest city for one of two reasons: 1) I have some kind of appointment or 2) I know some who lives there. Right now I’m able to drive there and park on the street. What should my alternative be once the city is “hostile” to cars? Remember, I live 30+ minutes away by car and take a highway to get there.

            • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think co2 ghgs global warming is by far the biggest environmental catastrophe coming our way. So the most important factor will be how will it impact co2 emissions.

              As I said, we should make alternatives to driving in cities as quickly as we can. But that will still take a while. What are you suggesting in the mean time? Not going places?

              EVs are much better than gas for minimizing co2 emissions. I think we should encourage them as a transitional solution till we have trains and walkable or bikeable cities.

      • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re still lugging around 1500 to 2000 kg of steel, glass & plastic to move around little more than your butt. You can do something more efficient than that, assuming the infrastructure is rigged up to handle it.

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yup, not ideal. But the available infrastructure is the key point as you said. A lot of places in the US there just isn’t an alternative.

    • GreenM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually, they are not common yet because car manufacturers knew they could potentially lose profit as it`s simpler (mechanically ) machine and thus car should break less and they would sell less as result.