It’s technically doable — just a lot more expensive than not burning fossil fuels in the first place. So nobody is doing it at any kind of meaningful scale, and we get what are basically exercises in doing very tiny amounts in order to create social permission to keep on extracting and burning.
It’s technically doable — just a lot more expensive than not burning fossil fuels in the first place. So nobody is doing it at any kind of meaningful scale, and we get what are basically exercises in doing very tiny amounts in order to create social permission to keep on extracting and burning.
I think the word you’re looking for is “theoretically,” not “technically.”
Not really. There are a handful of pilot-scale examples operating. So we know it’s technically doable.
This is fossil fuel industry propaganda.
NO carbon capture tech exists, or is on the foreseeable horizon, that is economically feasible.