• Ben Matthews@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    District heating makes sense from a purely technical point of view, however it’s important to consider social incentives too. Such systems were everywhere in former Soviet union, also in China. They can work great when they are new, but underground pipes eventually develop leaks, need digging up and fixing, and this got neglected during the soviet stagnation era (from Brezhnev onwards). Consequently, most of the hot water disappeared underground (I heard this from Ukrainian engineering students), steam rose from the ground in city streets (I saw this) - often damaging nearby structures, and even in mid Siberia there were lines without snow, above the pipes (also saw this). The subsequent inefficiency was a major factor behind the flop of the post-soviet economies in the 1990s (Ukraine had highest emissions / GDP in the world at that time). Unfortunately fixing leaky old pipes is not sexy for political leaders who prefer big new power projects.
    So - it can be done, but depends on the reliability of the social system.

    • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Beh, they’re extremely common in the Nordics too, and I guarantee you the networks are well-maintained and not some sort of technical boondoggle. Sure there are occasional leaks etc. but they’re very quickly patched up