US telcos pitch "shared obligation" for tech firms to fund network buildouts.
  • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
    2·
    2 years ago

    I maintain this is an absurd idea. Everyone pays for their internet access. Presumably smart business people would build into that price some funding for upgrades over time.

  • kulta@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    2·
    2 years ago

    So ISPs are charging an arm and a leg, but they’re saying others should pay? I’d love to be in a business where someone else pays for my business expenses and I keep the revenue.

  • Moonguide@lemmy.ml
    2·
    2 years ago

    I’m not from the states so I don’t have no skin in the game, but correct me if I’m wrong, weren’t ISPs responsible for upgrading the country’s network, given a large amount of money, and just sat on their asses or something? I remember something to that effect.

    • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
      2·
      2 years ago

      Yes, they got almost half a TRILLION dollars from tax payers in various forms to roll out nationwide fiber, but did not roll out nationwide fiber. Never mind the absolutely ludicrous prices they charge along with crazy bullshit like data caps, throttling, and lying about advertised speeds.

  • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
    21·
    2 years ago

    This type of logic only makes sense in the case of public utilities, not privately owned companies.

    What do they think we’re paying for? I don’t see how the non-amortized costs (ie, non-infrastructure-buildout costs) could ever approach the amount they pull in revenue. This also ignores the fact that the telcos have gotten somewhere in the double-digit billions of dollars (iirc, around $40B) in taxpayer money to build out fiber infrastructure, that they never delivered on. What are they using this money for? What are they using their subscription revenue for?