- cross-posted to:
- rail@feddit.uk
- cross-posted to:
- rail@feddit.uk
You must log in or # to comment.
What a terrible click-bait headline. They’re not deleted indefinitely, they don’t have a date yet. It’s a complicated problem and will take time so solve, but it’s by no means indefinite.
they don’t have a date yet
quite literally the definition of an indefinite delay
like the other guy said, you’ve mistaken “there is a delay and we can’t define when it’ll be solved” (literally in+de+finite)
and “cancelled/abandoned/terminated/shelved/…” which would imply it is not delayed but stopped.
Those sound like things that should have been in the original specification?
The article didn’t say who is paying for the delay, TFL, or the train manufacturer?
I am going to guess the tax payer.
