• ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess if you include the territory that was very briefly held when Russia was making a push into Kyev, that’s true, but the lines in the East have held pretty steady since the early days of the war.

    Short of bringing US-style air superiority to play there, I can’t see that they’ll gain much in the near term.

    • ForgetReddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the play needs to be a stalemate/slow advance until Putin dies. His successor will either accelerate or withdraw imo. Can’t bleed resources like that forever and remain in power, Putin is grandfathered in but the new guy won’t be. Unfortunately Putin could die tomorrow or in ten years. Hopefully it’s sooner than later.

      • lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ukraine definitely has political stability and morale as good advantages. They’re also continually getting additional military support as time goes on.

          • lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            30
            ·
            1 year ago

            True, Russia has run out of prisoners, Wagner is gone, Chechens are disengaging, Belarus is s clear “no”, and the rest of the population is unwilling and getting restless.

            The Kremlin is too scared to even call it a war, let alone try widespread mobilization. They saw how Prigozhin waltz into Rostov-On-Don and act like a celebrity.

  • 1bluepixel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    50% since Russia’s gains early in the war, and most of it in late 2022 during the first counter-offensive.

    They have NOT been making major gains during the current counter-offensive, unfortunately.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The hardest part of the counteroffensive is the first part, they’re pushing into the most heavily defended and fortified territory held by Russia. It will obviously be slow going, until eventually they break through and progress will happen more rapidly after that.

    • anewbeginning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That was never going to happen. The lines have to strongly defended. But it is no assurance of defeat. It only increases the expense and time to recover. And once Ukrainians have some air force capabilities their combined arms offensive capabilities will be much greater.

      • lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought they’d been training on F-16s since last summer. Disappointing to see that moving so slowly

    • yata@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So, what exactly do people think is going to happen when the Russian army starts an offensive of their own against an exhausted and depleted Ukrainian army?

      The same thing that happened during the last Russian offensive, absolutely nothing because the Russian army is even more exhausted and depleted than the Ukrainians, and we seem to be in a period of military history again where the defense is much stronger than the offense (at least in a scenario with no clear air superiority).

    • maporita@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      F16’s won’t give Ukraine much of an advantage until sufficient numbers of pilots are a trained. There are two weapons that could immediately change the battlefield landscape. GLSDB’s and ATACM’s are long range precision bombs that would allow Ukraine to target Russian supply lines and ammunition stores far behind the front lines, including into Crimea. They both have backup inertial guidance systems in order to mitigate GPS jamming… which is a big problem for their current guided munitions.

      • lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        supply lines and ammunition stores

        And helis still on the pad. Much easier than trying to take them out with MANPADS teams or risking valuable AA systems near the front line.

    • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem with F-16’s is that when they’re inevitably shot down, the videos will be all over the net and it will look awful from a spend perspective.

      • darthfabulous42069@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The article says Ukrainian troops are going to be trained to fly F-16s in August, so his take is more realistic than yours honestly

        • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is absolutely no way in which a couple of airplanes will affect the war so drastically, furthermore it’s impossible for the US to provide Ukraine with enough of them since it takes so much to manufacture and they need to have a stockpile, meanwhile Russia could use airplanes that are older since Ukraine basically doesn’t have an air force and still get the upper hand.