The GOP hold on most of American radio seems pretty unshakable, but Democrats must get into the talk-radio game before ever more damage is done.
Those that talk the most are usually the ones you should listen to the least.
How a little bit of Russian money can shape the retards in the south
You can literally see the generational technical divide which is not clean.
I’d bet most households /car owners could have their age and political alignments rated solely on a few metrics.
-
Do you watch cable? Do you stream shows? Do you pirate.
-
Do you own a car? Use the radio or Bluetooth? Have a Spotify or YouTube account?
You’d easily see people’s politics fit in with where they get their content.
-
The time to stop this fascist talk before it became a problem was 69 years ago
Honestly radio is dying much like television.
Podcasting is the better space to get going.
Also tictoc.
We need to get the young folks of the incel pipeline .
Agreed
Ronald Reagan started the fight to get rid of the Fairness Doctrine.
Back in the Cronkite Era, if a station ran an editorial it had to provide equal time for opposing views.
Hold my beer!
-The Telecommunications Act of 1996
Rush Limbaugh and his gross career owes its entire existence to that. He is someone who believes that drug dealers and smugglers need to be shot without trial… and he himself was a drug dealer when he was hard for cash.
Tells you a good deal of what kind of person we’re dealing with here.
He is someone who believes…
I just want to point out that this dude is dead in case you hadn’t heard that piece of good news.
There should be regulation around use of the word “news”. Many of these stations call themselves “News Radio” as if they only reported verifiable facts, but well over 50% is opinion.
Speaking of regulation, their hateful opinions getting such a far reach is a direct result of the telocommunications act of '96
Whilst the act for which you speak definitely accelerated the bullshit, it wasn’t peaches and cream back in the day. Just look at the film Citizen Kane a fictitious (and lawsuit resistant) depiction of William Randolph Hearst. In it an exceptionally wealthy business man uses the media to promote his political aims. And to skew narratives outside of strict politics. A man who craves love and adoration but can’t reciprocate. Remind you of anyone? I would say Musk’s purchase of Twitter fills at least one of those molds, Trump the rest.
True and by way of conversation, Chinatown (1973) might as well have been made yesterday.
Anything presented as news should be kept separate from opinion. If it’s news, you should be able to defend it like it was said under oath.
Personally, I would love it if news channels had to distinguish opinion content from news by removing the word news from the screen and replacing it with the word opinion. That or some other clear and unmistakable signal to the audience should be there to establish whether the station is going on record and asserting facts or whether this is some talking head spewing bullshit.
It’s crazy that news papers have been doing this forever. You have your news section and opinion and editorial section. TV and radio should definitely follow the format and be clear about what they are presenting.
They tried with air America and it was ok but not really all that compelling. Truth and facts just don’t sell like toxic divisive fantasies.
It needed better talent. Thom Hartmann was the sole survivor because he’s actually listenable. Randi Rhodes and Ron Reagan were just shit. But progressive talk can be done well. Stephanie Miller is hilarious when she has the right crew, but she has a penchant for self-owning. She gave us John Fugelsang, who is just brilliant.
Isn’t that how we got the national treasure that is Rachel Maddow?
FOX News also.
Even in Canada. Most talk radio stations are right wing hate BS.
Go to the top podcast lists and you’ll see that one is also dominated by right-wing personalities too.
“Has arrived,” as though it hasn’t been churning just beneath the surface since the beginning, and succeeding in lifting its filthy maw above the water line many, many times.
US fascism arrived before radio was invented.
You’re free to leave. Because blanket statements and false accusations might work in your favor elsewhere.
The US? It’s not free to leave temporarily or permanently, no idea who lied to you. More importantly it’s conservatives like you that tend to give up instead of trying to make the world better.
I’m a conservative now? Boy, you really do like making your assumptions, don’t you? I’m going to guess that you’re no stranger to accusing people of supporting genocide, right?
Hilarious! Thanks for the laugh! Maybe check people’s comment history before making ignorant accusations and assumptions of others.
And are you seriously suggesting that I am incapable of leaving America if I chose? Man… I should cancel my vacation plans to Ireland I guess.
You’re advocating and defending a conservative party, if you’re not conservative that’s just silly.
As far as your second stent, 2/10.
You clearly have a reading comprehension problem.
That, or you’re a typical lemmy leftist that has no fucking clue what nuance is. My guess is that it’s a little of both. The latter is a result of the former.
It’s not a conservative stance to say America isn’t fascist. It is an ignorant stance to make blanket statements about an entire country of people, its history- and its entire culture of political belief.
I started off by suggesting that if they think America is fascist, they’re welcome to leave. YOU decided to blather on. Nonsense and poorly constructed attacks on who I am and what I believe in some sad semblance of a defense.
Learn how nuance affects everything that exists. The world isn’t black or white, yes or no, with us or against us. Nuance touches everything.
And learn it quick.
I’m right where I need to be.
Removed by mod
Well, that didn’t take long.
Bye!
Oh, and America isn’t fascist. The only people that think it is are pseudo-intellectual socialists that have no fucking clue about anything.
I dont think it is either, but heres the fucken thing all they said was that American fascism fucken predated radio and guess what the Confederacy was fascist. Sorry for making assumptions but your comment didnt leave much room for interpretation, learn to express yourself with word rather than using reactionary bullshit slogans.
But America isn’t fascist. So they’re wrong. It doesn’t predate shit. The confederacy may have had tendencies leaning towards fascism, but the confederacy wasn’t America.
So my point was that if they want to make ignorance-based blanket statements about about an entire country, they happen to be doing so about one that gives you the freedom to leave it.
Maybe they should exercise that freedom.
All they said was that US fascism arrived before radio. There isnt anything within their comment that indicates an opinion beyond that. They could be referring to anything from segreagation to the Confederacy to the southern colonies and their aristocracy. There isnt really any meat to their statement just the bare bones.
As far as I can tell based on the unspecific, generalized use of the terms by people across the political spectrum, “fascist” and “nazi” just mean someone or something with which someone disagrees or finds annoying, so under this much more nebulous definition, anyone and everything can be fascist.
For instance you and your comment are fascist. See? It worked!
I don’t deal in the bullshit flavor-of-the-week redefining of things. Fascism isn’t something that ever should be redefined. It’s a serious and incredibly harmful ideology that should not be joked about.
I’d no sooner call someone a fascist where they clearly aren’t defined as one, than I would accuse someone of being a rapist that isn’t one.
But then again, I’m an adult. And I know better.
Didn’t we try this once with “Air America”?
