• smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Aaw, I thought this vis was really cool until I read every single comment

  • murtaza64@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    10 million native Urdu speakers in Pakistan? there’s 11 million in Lahore alone and I’ve never met someone there who doesn’t speak Urdu

  • takeheart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The reason why English, French and Spanish are among the world’s most widespread languages has its roots in the imperial past of the nations where they originate

    Must be a hot day in Hong Kong for them to be throwing shade like that. It’s true of course but it’s true for all of the biggest languages that conquest played a significant part in their dispersal. Chinese, Arabic, etc are left out of the statement for some reason.

  • belastend@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Aaaaaah “Chinese”.

    A language family with many mutually unintelligible languages, large variantions in vocabulary and a script that us shared by all of them. And somehow we have to keep treating it as one language, so Winnie the Pooh isnt angry at us.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’d like to point out that the dialect-language-family distinction is really a continuum. As dialects drift apart from each other, there is no point where God comes in and declares a dialect has graduated into its own language. Mutual intelligibility simply decreases continuously.

      For instance, Portuguese and Spanish are widely considered to be different languages, although they are partially mutually intelligible, particularly in written form. Cantonese and Mandarin are less so, but still a bit. My uncle-in-law speaks Canto but can still understand my Mandarin (however, he can’t respond). I won’t deny that there is a political reason to want to refer to the Chinese/中文 languages as a single “language,” but the classification is honestly quite arbitrary. My understanding is that linguists generally place the category of “Chinese” somewhere between “language” and “family.”

      Is Scots a different language than English? I don’t think I could understand someone speaking Scots without incredible concentration.

      • belastend@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I am currently doimg course on both of these topics.

        Yes, there is a continuum between these concepts, but there is a much better case for the idea that all ibero-romance languages are actually one language than for the “Chinese Macrolanguage”.

        Hakka for example is not mutually intelligible with any of the other branches of the family, yet it is still considered to be a dialect of Chinese. Why? Because it shares the script?

        The political reason, imho, far outweigh the linguistical reasons for considering Chinese to be a language rather than a family.

    • NorthWestWind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yeah. It’s not like I can communicate with someone in Cantonese when they only know Mandarin.

      If the same script is considered Chinese, might as well put Japanese Kanji inside.

  • Todd_cross@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Why are Russia, Central Asia, Mongolia, and the Caucasus “Asia Major”, and East Asia and South Asia “Asia Minor”? I also think it’s weird they split Eastern and Western Europe since Germany and Bulgaria (EDIT: and Poland(EDIT2: and Belarus Ukraine, and Latvia, but they’re colored orange as if theyre included in “Asia Minor”)) are the only countries I see from the region in the circle. Also Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan being in the “Middle East” seems weird to me.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I don’t think this image accounts for second languages (otherwise Hindi would be twice as big), and as I understand it the reason that English is the official languae of Nigeria even as an independent country is so as not to give anyone’s first language priority over any other

      • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It does specify these are first languages/mother tongues. I think English would also be much larger if it included second languages.

      • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’ve met a handful of Nigerian students from different parts of the country and they all spoke English as a first language. Also, the US is on there, we don’t have an official language either.

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I think you’ve misunderstood me a bit. English is the official language of Nigeria. One of the reasons it’s the official language was that it was seen as neutral within Nigeria because it wasn’t any group’s first language. Or it was at the time, anyway. That was an entire human lifetime ago now, so it’s quite possible that things have changed a bit since then.