• YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
    shield
    OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If there is interest we can add the Mississippi, Missouri, and Michigan election news here as well. They are state and local primary elections but I’ve not seen much interest by the community.

    Edit: Looks like there isn’t.

    • dezmd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do it anyway maybe? The more informed people, the better they can be at making decisions.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Good analysis as usual from 538: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/ohio-issue-1-abortion-ballot-measures/

    For those who haven’t seen coverage yet, in brief: as usual republicans saw a defeat coming in a democratic election (the 50%+1 threshold November ballot initiative to enshrine reproductive rights into Ohio’s constitution), so they are attempting to change the rules in their favor (require constitutional amendments to get 60% of the vote, effectively allowing minority rule) in an early off-season ballot measure today.

    Despite the early positive indications that this measure has an uphill battle, if you are in Ohio please vote.

  • 2piradians@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Is this the same referendum format requiring half the votes +1 to pass? The exact thing they’re trying to kill off?

    EDIT: The measure should have to be supported by the same vote threshold to pass that it seeks to impose.

    • lingh0e@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 year ago

      The irony is even dumber since they already passed HB 458 which forbids such an election in August.

      They broke their own rule, a rule that they themselves pushed through.

      Don’t ever pretend that the GOP cares about rules or laws. They will literally do whatever they must to remain in power.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sort of the ironic soft underbelly of small-d democratic institutions. You overthrow them by winning power democratically and keeping it by force, whereas if someone wants to take it back for democracy they have to then take it by force and keep it democratically, the harder proposition.

  • snipgan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/election-results/2023/ohio-issue-1/

    Votes received and percentages of total vote
    Response Votes Pct.
    Yes 111,710 28.4 %
    No 281,694 71.6 %
    An estimated 12.6 percent of votes have been counted.

    As of 7:50 PM right now.

    Edit 1: 7:53 PM
    Yes 138,143 29.4 %
    No 331,325 70.6 %

    Edit 2: 7:55 PM
    Yes 158,861 29.1 %
    No 387,174 70.9 %

    17.5% counted.

    Edit 3: 8:04 PM
    Yes 193,220 29.7 %
    No 457,553 70.3 %

    20.8% counted.

    Edit 4: 8:19 PM

    Yes 232,355 30.9 %
    No 519,368 69.1 %

    24.1% counted. Yeah I don’t see it passing.

    Edit 5: 8:25 PM

    Wasserman and Decision Desk already called it for No. Will see how big of a margin now, but it is clear the proposition failed.

    Edit 6: 8:48 PM

    Yes 376,012 37.1 %
    No 638,696 62.9 %

    32.5% counted.

    Edit 7: 8:56 PM

    Washington Post projects No winning.

    Yes 429,617 38.1 %
    No 697,980 61.9 %

    36.9% counted.

    Edit 8: 9:15 PM

    Yes 603,050 40.7 %
    No 878,360 59.3 %

    47.4% counted. Keep in mind a lot of the urban/city areas haven’t even counted most of their votes yet where the more rural areas have.

    Edit 9: 9:22 PM

    Yes 744,053 42.5 %
    No 1,006,127 57.5 %

    56% counted.

    Edit 10: 9:30 PM

    Yes 809,110 42.8 %
    No 1,082,764 57.2 %

    60.5 % counted. Urban areas still undercounted.

    Edit 11: 10:06 PM

    Yes 1,100,677 43.2 %
    No 1,448,086 56.8 %

    81.5% counted.

    Edit 12: 10:36 PM

    Yes 1,217,867 43.4 %
    No 1,585,920 56.6 %

    89.7% counted. Cuyahoga and Lucas counties seem to be the ones having a decent chunk to count still. Both heavily leaning No.

    Edit 14: 8:33 AM

    Yes 1,315,346 43.0 %
    No 1,744,094 57.0 %

    97.9% counted. Looking like a slam dunk and massive support for No. Winner winner chicken dinner.

    • lingh0e@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really hope the numbers stay at these levels. This issue needs to not only fail, it needs to be demolished with extreme prejudice. The goons who put this on the ballot need to see that they are absolutely on the wrong side of history.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh boy if it stays ~30 something to ~60, the legislators may regret this. Plus if it’s 60+, the proposition will have failed by the proportion they were proposing.

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    OK, these numbers are looking remarkably good. Definitely exceeding predictions that already had the measure being soundly defeated.

    So I have to wonder… How far off are the polls nationally? We know the Republican party is shrinking, and we know that polls are getting harder to do because people under 50 tend not to answer cellphone calls from numbers they don’t know.

    Is it possible that next year will actually be a landslide for both Biden and Democrats in the House and Senate? I don’t want to get too hopeful, but Ohio’s kind of a bellwether, and this… This looks good. This looks very good.

    • Kingofthezyx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every year, 4 million people are newly eligible to vote as they turn 18, while 2.5 million people over the age of 65 lose their ability to vote due to death.

    • Jonna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just remember that a minimum wage increase WON in Florida with a higher percentage than Trump, even tho both candidates opposed it. If Democrats don’t run to progressive positions, they don’t benefit from the public sentiment.

    • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I personally think Biden wins by 80%

      Republicans have near zero support in the United States and the 2024 election will be an embarrassment for them.

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        80% is a serious exaggeration. At least 25% of the electorate would vote for Trump even if he ate a baby on live television.

      • NABDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s important to remember how close the election in 2020 was. Just looking at the popular vote:

        81,282,916 for Biden 74,223,369 for Trump

        46.9% of the people who voted wanted more of the same. I don’t think that number has dropped much since then.

        Trump still has the support of almost half the people in the United States. It might be easier mentally to forget that, but we can’t let up. We have to treat the next election and every other election like our lives depend on it!

        Suggesting that somehow ~62% of the Trump supporters from 2020 suddenly came to their senses seems pretty damn farfetched. If 10% of the people who voted for Biden in 2020 decide they don’t need to bother in 2024 because “Republicans have near zero support”, then Trump could win.

        Personally, I believe if we have the same desperate need to defeat Trump in 2024, and drive turnout to the same degree, there might be a few percentage points increase in favor of Biden. If we relax and assume it’s already won, we’ll have another four years of Trump.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I actually think you should make it somewhat difficult to do direct democracy votes. There was a crisis in California a while back because the voters decided to mandate taxes don’t go up, and also spending does go up substantially. As separate propositions, both things sound good, but the reason for little-r republican representation is that if your legislator did both those things and caused a crisis you would vote them out. People in charge of institutions have longer term responsibility.

    Or look at Brexit where a slight majority voted for it and a majority now regret it since it caused all the economic pain and political chaos everyone was saying it would.

    So I think there is an argument for the threshold being above 50%, I think 60% is pretty high but you can make the argument, maybe something in the middle is reasonable. Preferable to me is something like a double approval process…any amendment needs to get approved by 50%+, followed by a mandatory vote in the legislature and if confirmed it would become law, but if it fails it would get another public vote where it would need to get 50%+ and if it got it, become law.

    All that said, I don’t want abortion banned in Ohio, I know that’s pretty heavily a part of this vote in particular but just wanted to talk about the actual argument for a bit.

    • MacGuffin94@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not an unreasonable reaction but this one in Ohio is different in several ways.

      1 The GOP super majority passed a lady abolishing August special elections that went into effect on January 2023. They are immediately ignoring this law and had to create a loophole to even hold this election.

      2 It does not just raise the passing vote threshold. It mandates signatures from 100% of Ohio counties to even place a measure on the ballot. And it’s not just 1 signature is a proportion of the counties population. Idk how well you know Ohio but that is almost effectively impossible.

      3 The GOP are blatantly short cutting the November election and chose 60% because polling places support for the amendment enshrining abortion rights at about 58%.

      4 This is a simple majority to pass but raises it for everything else which is hypocritical. Amendments of this Nature should have to pass at the threshold they are attempting to set.

  • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    AP projects issue 1 is defeated.

    This is a seems somewhat hopeful sign about the current electorate. And turnout looks much better than anticipated. 40% in many areas so far. For a special election, that’s very high.

  • dezmd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The entire country is metro areas, suburbs, college towns, and everything else is rural Arkansas. Florida just gets that added bonus of the Sunshine Laws that do so well to expose the crazies in an efficient manner. Florida overall has not actually been full on red for decades (maybe conservative tinted, but not R red), even if it kinda feels like it.

  • aidan@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well the point of a constitution is to bind the future majority, so it makes sense to require significant/overwhelming majority of counties to support it.

    • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      significant/overwhelming majority of counties

      Change “counties” to “people” and I might agree. But “significant majority of counties” is just an extension of the anti-democratic bias that we see in the Senate and EC. It should always be one-person-one-vote.

      • aidan@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        But a federalist system isn’t meant to be democratic. It is supposed to guarantee rights and some influence to everyone including minorities.

        • Pipoca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Requiring a majority of counties to agree on things isn’t good for minorities in general.

          It generally grants outsized power to one specific minority in particular - white rural voters.

          • aidan@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes rural voters. That is again the point. Federalism is supposed to balance power between the entities of the federation- which aren’t necessarily the populace.

            • Pipoca@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No.

              Federalism is about division of power at different scales of government.

              In a confederation, the general level of government is subordinate to the regional level. In a unitary government, regional government is subordinate to the general level.

              Israel, the UK, and China are examples of unitary states. The EU is a confederation, and the US was one for about a decade before the constitution was passed.

              In a federal system, different levels of government are of equal power, but have different powers. States can’t control interstate commerce; the federal government can’t regulate state speed limits except by doing something like withholding federal highway trust fund money.

              While the US federal government started out as an alliance between existing colonies, states didn’t start out as an alliance of counties. US States are mostly (all?) unitary governments; Ohio counties have the powers the state government delegates to them.

              Counties historically have been a matter of pragmatic. Counties are small so everyone could easily travel to their local county government on foot or horseback. They weren’t intended as a way to gerrymander state populations to entrench rural power.

              There’s a reason that neither the Ohio senate nor the Ohio house follow ‘one county, one representative’. Because that would be absolutely bonkers.

        • lingh0e@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What are you talking about? “Minorities” in this context refers to the people with the lower number of votes cast. They lose. It’s the very definition of voting.

          • aidan@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Minorities” in this context refers to the people with the lower number of votes cast.

            Yes.

            They lose. It’s the very definition of voting.

            Not necessarily? Plenty of candidates lose the popular vote then win elections in all sorts of campaigns.

    • EmptySlime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wanting to raise the threshold isn’t inherently bad. But from what I’ve read on this their legislature previously banned August elections like this because of poor turnout and they’re also trying to make it effectively impossible to even put a measure like this on the ballot to get that increased majority by requiring a large amount of signatures from every county in the state. Meaning it would only take one county to not get enough people and it theoretically wouldn’t matter if literally every single other person in the state signed onto the petition; It wouldn’t get in the ballot.

      It seems like the 60% rather than 50% is just to try and hide the ball so they can effectively outlaw popular grassroots action going directly to the ballot.

    • cowfodder@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Republicans in Ohio saw what Michigan Democrats have been able to do because of constitutional amendments and shit themselves

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ballot initiatives and referendums and amendments are proving to be the bane of the Republican Party. Even in Missouri, a referendum had voters approve an ACA Medicaid expansion. Voters weren’t willing to send a majority of Democrats to the legislature to accomplish the same thing.

        This is an Achilles’s Heel to the Republican strategy of total loyalty to the party. The voters can still be liberal on individual issues, and these direct democracy votes bypass party loyalty to get at the actual issue.