Google has quietly deprecated the Messages and Dialer apps in AOSP, and it could have ramifications for upstart brands and custom ROM fans.

  • kbity@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 years ago

    At this point it’s just a countdown until Google winds down AOSP altogether and takes its whole mobile OS proprietary.

    • sadreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 years ago

      I am sure they are watching RedHat playbook closely.

      These clowns need to be broken up. Enough is enough.

    • Neon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      oh god, please no, mobile Linux is not yet ready 😩
      and i say that as a hardcore NixOS-User

      • kbity@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I’ve been watching the mobile Linux space with interest but it’s definitely not in a place yet where I would consider using it as anything more than a novelty. The PinePhone is a neat little piece of hardware but no way it can replace my LineageOS phone right now.

        • sado1@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Looks like the ecosystem still needs another year or two, but it’s going forward steadily.

        • tal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I was vaguely wondering how hard it would be to use a GNU/Linux laptop as a phone. If you always carry a laptop, that’s more-reasonable than it might seem, and that opens things up hardware-wise a lot. There are at least three obstacles:

          • The touch-oriented app infrastructure is stronger on smartphone OSes.

          • Laptops aren’t as good at idling power-wise as phones. You want to be able to listen for calls without consuming a lot of power.

          • Apparently, while you can get 5G modems for laptops, getting one for a computer that can do voice service is not an option today. You can do VoIP or something, but I suspect that you’re looking at a latency hit then.

          • kbity@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Can they at least handle texting? A lot of services require SMS-based 2FA (insecure as it is) these days, so a phone that can’t receive texts is a complete non-starter.

            • tal@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I don’t know that off-the-top-of-my-head, but I would guess that with normal voice service the modem may well also handle texts, as at least historically, I believe the SMSes went over space in some sort of command channel separate from the per-active-phone timeslice reserved for voice.

              However, you could hypothetically get SMS service and relay that to a your laptop-phone over IP from some service that provides VoIP service. With SMSes, unlike with voice, the latency shouldn’t really matter.

      • Johanno@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        How hard is it to transform the steam deck into a phone? I mean the Software is still missing, but with enough Power you can emulate apps.

        • tal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, for starters, it doesn’t have a 5G modem, which is probably kind of going to be a basic want for a phone.

    • anselmschueler@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It seems to me that that might seriously deter third-party Android distributors—AFAIK most do not ship stock Google apps for all the basic utilities, they only ship the auxiliary ones like Gmail or Docs.

  • nobodyspecial@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    OK Google, you win. I capitulate. Next phone is going to be Apple. If it’s locked down, low customization walled garden either way I’d rather something with trade in value and a bit of snob appeal.

    • PabloDiscobar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Or just don’t buy a phone. The resources required to build a phone are literally destroying our planet. I wish I was exaggerating.

      • nobodyspecial@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wish I could, and I’m completely with you on both manufacturing and mining needed to enable our phone addictions. But I need it to function in modern society, much like my car or industrially farmed food. Being reachable and being able to reach out 24x7 is now an expectation. I don’t have the practiced skills to be useful as an agrarian, and not being into religion I’m pretty sure the Amish wouldn’t take me in.

        Once the not-user-serviceable battery dies or hardware start to glitch at around 2 years of age a replacement is mandatory for me. Apple’s phones seem to be designed for a service life of 3-4 years rather than 1-2, so that may be a way to help.

  • quortez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unfortunate, but somewhat of a formality. AOSP Messages and Dialer were essentially deprecated as it was already, and we have many projects ready to take their place.

  • Anselm Schüler@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Aren’t there alternative dialer and messaging apps out there? The existing dialer and messaging apps on AOSP are already old & massively out-of-line with the rest of the OS.

  • Gloop Tamer@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because Android users notoriously complain about their OS not being completely locked down with zero freedom whatsoever!

  • PabloDiscobar@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    But…but… Isn’t AOSP open source? Did someone lie to me? Just restore the functions! Right? Am I right?

    Or was Google just exploiting people believing that they were participating to an open source project?

    This news serves as perhaps further evidence of AOSP’s reduced significance, as Google seeks to tie more and more previously open-source features behind its own proprietary frameworks and services.

    Surprise motherfuckers! \o/

  • Sam@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been slowly migrating to postmarketos, android will only get worse.

  • sado1@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m guessing it’s not a big deal to replace it with a third party text messaging open source app; I’m not sure about the Dialer, though.

    It would be an interesting solution, to port a few mobile Linux apps to Android (some of them are already there) - I’m a bit worried about potential maintenance burden for platform support; but it could benefit KDE/GNOME apps by getting feedback from a bigger bunch of users.

  • AceFour@lemmy.thesmokinglounge.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I got sick of vendors being a year behind on updates which would prompt me to use a custom ROM. Decided to finally just get a pixel and live with the fact I will never be able to de-google myself unless I totally leave the eco-system

  • pgetsos@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They have been doing it app by app for a decade. Nothing new to see here, wonder when they’ll deprecate Android altogether

  • wxboss@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Big tech conglomerates thrive on their user base. They lure you in, get you hooked into their ecosystem, and then try to convince you to become dependent upon their services.

    This tactic is just gas-lighting. There are other options out there but they don’t want you to be aware of them or seek them out.

    • eltimablo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a shitty tactic for sure, but it’s not gaslighting. Gaslighting would be if they acted like everyone who mentioned the AOSP dialler was crazy for thinking it ever existed. This is standard drug-slinger bullshit.