• Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    She will once again campaign only in states where it is possible to flip to Trump. Instead of safer states where she could get 5% of the vote and thus qualify for matching funds for the green party.

    That is how you know it’s completely bullshit and she is being run as a spoiler candidate for Trump.

    Well that and the picture of her and Michael Flynn sitting at Putins table at a Russian state dinner in December of 2015.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How tragic is it that there isn’t even enough enthusiasm to maintain a genuine, non-astroturfed or political spoiler based environment first party and platform?

      As pissed off as some are, anyone myself included not getting arrested trying to protest/sabotage oil lines aren’t taking the destruction of our only shared habitat we all rely on literally from one breath to the next seriously enough.

      I know I know, we don’t need to breathe, we don’t need crops or fresh water, we just need more jerbs and a stronger economy to drop dead in. Lol, humans, I’d say nothing of value will be lost, but we aren’t just killing ourselves. And as projections continue to worsen, and our circumstances grow more dire, all the other species that had nothing to do with what we did will barely enter our collective minds as we languish in self-pity, as if the once bountiful Earth we raped, pillaged, and burned somehow betrayed us instead of the other way around.

      • TechyDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Part of the problem is the First Past The Post system. Any third party will just bleed votes away from the closest major party. In the case of a party dedicated to protecting the environment, this means votes taken from the Democrats. If the third party grows too powerful, they will split too many votes with the Democrats and Republicans will take control. And once that happens, the environment will be trashed. (Well, trashed even more than it already has been.)

        If we switched to Ranked Choice Voting or Approval Voting, you could vote for a third party and still pick a major party candidate as your fallback position. So you could theoretically vote for Jill Stein (ignoring all the other problems with her) and vote for Biden as your second pick (or third or fourth). When Stein failed to get enough votes, your vote won’t be wasted, but would revert to a different choice.

  • Lemdee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    Until we get ranked choice voting or similar the Green Party is a joke with zero chance of election. Voting for them only helps Republicans at this point in time.

    • roo@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      If less enthusiastic Republican voters have a chance to vote for a neutral party instead of voting for a shitshow, then how is it helping Republicans?!

      • Lemdee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol it’s not Republicans voting for the green party, the green party has only ever siphoned votes from the Democratic candidates.

        • Sybil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          27
          ·
          1 year ago

          the votes belong to the voters, not to the parties. democrats need to earn their votes just like everyone else.

          • Lemdee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            1 year ago

            The GOP is attempting to destroy democracy, the Dems are not. The GOP are trying to subjugate me as a queer/trans person and POC as well, the Dems are not. The GOP are removing human rights from us, the Dems are not. The Dems are trying to pass green energy legislation, gun control laws, and more while the GOP are blocking it.

            Those are some pretty good god damn reasons.

              • AnonTwo@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                So you read all of that and you could only muster an emotional response.

                I think that says all that needs to be said. You’d rather enable our democracy to be destroyed (and you know, make it harder to do anything about fascism later) and vote in a way that will make you feel a little better about yourself while it goes into the void.

                • Sybil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  voting for fascist does make it harder to get fascist out of a power. that’s why I don’t vote for democrats.

              • probablyaCat@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah see how that turns out if the republicans win next election. They facilitate fascism by being the only alternative to actual fascist politicians. They certainly aren’t perfect, but seriously how do you think it plays out if enough morons like you vote for Putin apologist Stein? What do you think the end result will be?

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Just trying to help:

                Neoliberalism was an attempt to save both the state and capitalism. Capitalism, however, cannot be rehabilitated. It will not save us from totalitarianism or state-sponsored genocide. Capital can absorb any product, service, or practice (including government practice) into itself and then reproduce itself. It is always primed for, always flirting with, the spectre of fascism. Source

      • AnonTwo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        She’s a democrat choice not a republican choice.

        Source: voted for her in 2016

    • Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      if i would vote for jill stein or cornel west (i mean, i have to be honest, it’s nice to have choices) or the libertarian or no candidate at all, how do any of those votes help republicans?

      the only vote that helps republicans is a vote for a republican.

      • Lemdee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wrong. Dead fucking wrong. Due to our current shitty system the only parties with any chance of winning are Dems or GOP, every vote that doesn’t go to the Dems is another point the GOP has over them. If you don’t vote for Dems you’re facilitating fascism. Simple as.

        I don’t like our choices but we don’t have the option to be fucking picky right now, there’s fascists at the door and they’re working hard to ruin our lives.

        • Sybil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          these aren’t magic phrases that change my vote for one person into a vote for another person.

  • awnery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    ranked choice voting because i’d choose a chupacabra’s cloaca over trump. but jill stein is just here to talk and distract. she has a platform, she can use it, she doesn’t have to make shit worse.

    • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Chupacabra’s cloaca.

      There are at least three truly cursed combinations of words out there in the world that most only see a handful of times throughout their lifespan. They are both forbidden and beautiful in their execution.

      • awnery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        lmao i’m glad you had such a visceral response. all i did was say trump was less worthy of my vote than the evacuation port of a cryptid vampire coyote, and i think we could solve this kind of obvious dilemma with ranked choice voting

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s see:

    • Fascism is calling from inside the house
    • All of the Republican candidates are fascists
    • The Supreme Court is stacked with Federalist Society-bred Christian Originalists.
    • Trump is likely going to be the Republican nominee

    And here’s Jill, like, “Mmm, yeah. Now’s a good time to try to split the vote.”

    • Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      i think she’s thinking “now’s a good time for a green president” or maybe “now is a good time for an antiwar president” or “now is a good time for a woman president”. but what do i know? i’m just gonna vote for her.

      • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        now is a good time for an antiwar president

        Then maybe pick someone who doesn’t support Russia’s war of imperial conquest against Ukraine.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, in the primaries, I’ll vote for whomever I personally like. But when Biden inevitably wins the nomination, I’ll be voting for him, because it’s either him or fascism. That’s not a hard choice to make.

            • Sybil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              it actually has a meaning.

              it sure does. hey, do you think Biden should march into Congress and take the fasces off the wall, or just drape an American flag over them?

            • Sybil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              fascism is a reactionary ideology the arose in response to leftist ideology like libertarian socialism or communism. a fascist society is strictly stratified and forces every institution to serve the interests of the state. liberal democracies are breeding grounds for fascism. look at the war on drugs or the cias war on communism. then look at every opportunity Biden had to endorse them or hinder them over the last 50 years.

              • Telorand@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s not what fascism is (or at least, it’s too broad of a definition). I think you’re responding in good faith, so:

                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

                Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

                Being reactionary is a facet of Conservatism, and being on the political right itself, can have considerable overlap with fascism, but fascism itself need not be reactionary.

                But Biden supporting the war on drugs, for example, doesn’t make him a fascist. It makes him a supporter of a partial police state, sure, but that’s still not the same thing. Additionally, he’s made considerable effort to promote democracy, something a fascist wouldn’t do. And if he was a fascist, he would be a darling of the extreme right politicians and media, the “Democrat they always wished for.” Instead, they are doing everything they can to invent evidence to impeach him.

                Biden is a self-avowed Zionist, and part of old-guard-Democrats who support(ed) some awful policies. But there is no way you can honestly construe him as being cut from the same cloth as Hitler or Trump.

    • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ouch, that is some of Russia’s top brass, what the hell is she doing in the middle of all that?

      I just went from… maybe… to nope in one picture.

  • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No thanks. I’ll vote who is likely to win based on mathematics with weighs on preference on top and those I prefer on the downballot. Do this enough time, and there will be a split between progressives and moderates when conservatives eventually become ineffective minority.

    • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I cast a Jill Stein protest vote in 2012 because Obama had a lock on my state, and I felt like Obama and the Dems in general had strayed too far to the right. Obviously, Obama won my state and the presidency, which is what I actually wanted. I just felt like we could move the Dems to the left by showing them they were leaving votes on the table. That does not work. I can get into why, but the basics are that third parties only act as spoilers.

      In any case, Jill Stein is a terrible candidate on paper. All she does is mouth the dream set of policies a lot of us would love, but has no program to achieve them, she has no experience picking staff or running a large organization, she has all the charisma of a rotten banana, and she refused to throw down against anti-vax because it’d alienate half her base.

      I’m for a serious Green Party in the US - one that is actually oriented towards governing. The Greens internationally are a real party, not the party equivalent of Vermin Supreme.

      Honestly, most of the US agrees with the Greens on a lot of issues, and they could make enough of a big tent that a seriously (constructed and funded) Green Party could probably take multiple seats in the House, at the very least. They could caucus with the Dems, but try to pull things left. They’d work like the Squad, or Bernie and Warren. Between the coasts and the big cities, they could probably swing ten or more seats.

      But instead we get Jill, yet again. Honestly, I’d like to see an investigation of her Trump-like election challenging fundraising.

  • BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well it’s certainly better than Howie again. Cornel West should’ve stuck with the party. Him on greens would have had an unprecedented shot.