• EpicVision@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    uBlock Origin has 36,000,000 users according to Google and ABP has 46,000,000 users. Another 13,000,000 use AdGuard and 67,000,000 use AdBlock (the crappy one, but nonetheless, it blocks YouTube ads).

    Also on Firefox there are 7,780,587 uBO users. Checkmate

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I use uBlock origin on firefox. All my devices are always connected through a VPN with all the ad and tracker blocks turned on.

      I am a YouTube premium subscriber.

      There are dozens of us… dozens!!!

    • Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Imagine being me and paying for premium and using ublock + revanced.

      At the end of the day, I think I get 10 dollars in value a month, and I know hosting data isn’t free.

      Edit: Right after I submitted I read the comment before me. Sorry about saying the exact same thing again 😅

      • EpicVision@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I wouldn’t ever give Google a single penny. Instead, I pay for Nebula, allowing me to watch high quality videos and documentaries while supporting indie creators. And it’s just $5/month.

          • EpicVision@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s definitely worth it. And it’s better to help independent creators instead of giving money to Google or other shady big tech companies.

        • acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not enough content on Nebula. I subscribed because of a couple YouRubers I follow, but there’s just not much there (at least that I watch).

          • EpicVision@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            These are some Nebula creators I like

            • TLDR News (and their other channels)
            • NileRed
            • PolyMatter
            • ColdFusion
            • TechAltar
            • Ali Abdaal
            • Thomas Frank
            • Wendover Productions
            • RealLifeLore
            • Climate Town
            • Half as Interesting
            • Real Engineering
            • BobbyBroccoli
            • EposVox
            • Not Just Bikes

            I still occasionally use YouTube, but much less than before. I also enjoy Odysee and PeerTube. Grayjay is an amazing Android app to manage all these streaming platforms in one central place.

            • acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Thanks for the list! I actually got nebula because of RealLifeLore and Wendover. I’ve since subscribed to TLDR News and Real Engineering so I’ll have to give the other creators on your list a view.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m interested. It’s a real shame they just paywall the entire app and don’t give you a chance to explore what’s there a little.

      • Krudler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Thank you for being this way.

        I think platform greed is awful, but I think consumer greed is something that largely goes unacknowledged.

        Even though I’ve been ‘over’ the genre for more than a decade, I still buy Japanese shmups when they appear on Steam - at one time they could only be found on obscure JP Warez sites, forget legally here. I do it out of a sense of something owed for past joy, and never play the Steam ver.

        I’m also hypocritical to a degree. I can only afford to support so much and I don’t pay for everything, just what I would have paid for anyways. Perhaps there is some self-satisfying logic built in there lol

    • EpicVision@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago
      Chrome Web Store Firefox Add-ons Microsoft Edge Add-ons Opera add-ons Total
      uBlock Origin 36,000,000 7,780,587 10,000,000 12,686,907 66,467,494
      uBlock Origin Lite 70,000 3,145 3,000 N/A 73,145
      uBlock 700,000 N/A ‪10,000 N/A 710,000
      AdNauseam N/A 74,478 10,000 210,616 295,094
      AdBlock Plus 46,000,000 4,064,146 10,000,000 50,844,211 110,908,357
      AdBlock 67,000,000 1,206,627 N/A N/A 68,206,627
      AdGuard 13,000,000 1,053,029 8,000,000 10,872,145 32,925,174
      Total 162,770,000 14,182,012 28,023,000 74,613,879 279,588,891

      Source: Official data from extension stores

      This table does not include Safari extensions, browser extensions installed through Linux package managers like the firefox-ublock-origin package on Arch Linux, browsers with built in adblockers like LibreWolf or Brave, modded YouTube mobile apps like Vanced/Revanced on Android, uYou for iOS, alternative frontends like Invidious or Piped, desktop clients like FreeTube, other mobile apps like Newpipe, Libretube or Yattee or other adblocking solutions.

      • EpicVision@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        If we also count other (less popular) adblockers, the Microsoft Edge addon store, browsers that come with pre-installed adblockers like Librewolf and Brave, people who use the package manager on their Linux distro to install browser extensions, alternative YouTube clients like Vanced/Revanced, Newpipe and Libretube as well as alternative frontends like Invidious and FreeTube, I’m pretty sure we still come out at over 100 million.

  • darthsid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Watch how they steadily increase the price now (which they’ve already been doing)

    • ripley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      It went up like four bucks this month for me this past month. I feel like I am in a no-win situation. I want to support the authors of the videos and music I like, make the platform sustainable, and I hate ads and data harvesting. There doesn’t seem to be reasonable way to satisfy all three objectives (or even two).

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m mostly in the same boat with supporting the creators, however I don’t really like Google to be honest. I end up supporting creators outside the platform, such as via Patreon or by watching on Nebula. Most of my YT consumption is done via NewPipe, Piped and Freetube

        There’s a little part of me that likes the fact that YouTube is burning a hole in Google’s finances tbh lol

      • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Patreon for the ones you really like, and substituting watching my own content on Plex is how I’m weening myself off YouTube.

        • prince of space@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I wish there was arr software for YouTube that included Sponsorblock. Every one I’ve tried hasn’t really worked. Need it to be automated or I’m stuck using YouTube.

      • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Unfortunately, anymore, even if you pay, companies (especially googie) are STILL harvesting and selling your data… I don’t know if there’s a way to avoid it without either unplugging entirely or going full in on dark web and anonymous browsing techniques, and even then, your data will still be harvested from other people in your life

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      If it wasn’t as freaking high as it is there would be a lot more premium users. Every other streaming service is full of professionally made movies and TV shows. YouTube is absolutely chock-full of berate crap where they’re barely paying anybody but the top 1%. It’s a grift. It should be priced with the absolute cheapest services out there.

      • Technofrood@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The price makes a little more sense if you factor in it also includes YouTube music, which puts it more on par with a premium Spotify subscription, with the benefit of no ads on YouTube. Which is basically how I got YouTube premium, I was already paying a monthly fee for Google Play music as it was at the time, and the upgrade to add YouTube premium was only £2 extra a month.

        • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sure but a LOT of us don’t want the music service and have never used it once. People like me aren’t costing them a penny on music and if they offered a plan without music I’d jump in an instant.

          • EineCat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            This is my issue. I have and love Apple Music and do not want to pay for another music service. If YT gave me an option for an ad-free YT without music for only like $3 or $5 a month, I’d jump on it. For now, I’ll continue using uBlock Origin and SmartTube.

          • borZ0 the t1r3D b3aR@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I agree with this sentiment completely. Not sure if they still do it or not, but YTM started out letting you upload your own music and then being able to access it across any device through the app. YTM doesn’t have the best catalog now, let alone when they started so i think the upload feature was a way of acknowledging that. I uploaded both local bands that are defunct and literally nowhere online and artists that didn’t embrace the internet age and restricted their catalogs. I can still listen to the music i uploaded back then through the app or a browser. That feature set it apart from the other options available at the time. I guess I’m trying to say that i also want to own my own music, but i dont hate the convenience of some of it floating in the cloud waiting for me to pull it down. Speaking of… ownCloud is dope and what i’m transitioning to for my media. When in doubt, roll your own solution.

            • linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              As long as it own cloud doesn’t do what next cloud did and try to rename all of my files on import then only retain their names and databases. Currently holding my own with Plex /jellyfin

        • ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah, that’s what made me get premium. Even before the adblocker crackdown, the prospect of supporting creators and being able to ditch Spotify’s horrible artist compensation model made it a simple choice.

        • PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I was in the same boat for ages and was happy paying as I kept the original rate. Then they bumped it by almost 50% end of December. Quit before the change took effect and have been using ad block ever since. The ONLY thing I miss is YouTube music as I’ve gotten too lazy to rip the remixes/soundtracks that aren’t on other streaming services.

      • elgordio@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        While YouTube doesn’t commission, much, content it does store disproportionately more data. A streaming site has maybe 1,000,000 hours of content. That amount of content is uploaded to YouTube every day. It’s a totally different business model.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          And, I don’t think I should be the one paying for that.

          They should charge minor storage fees to the creators and uploaders. You pay to put your content up there if people watch it you get paid back as many multiples as necessary. It would be a fantastic method to reduce the amount of trash video stored up there that nobody ever watches.

            • linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’d say we’re at an impasse, but if I don’t buy premium and I don’t watch ads in their content, they’re not getting paid.

              If they paid a pittance to keep their storage and it pushed their quality up and push the price of premium down more people would watch and they’d make a hell of a lot more money.

                • linearchaos@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I only started blocking the ads when yt started allowing 2 back to back 15 second advertisements and creators started putting in mid rolls.

                  This crap they’re pulling is downward spiral. They can’t get 20% more yoy by squeezing people to pay Netflix prices for crap. And most of the creators need patrion to even survive.

                  I truly hoped something like Odyssey could survive and we could just dht our likes. But it just becomes a sesspool.

          • borZ0 the t1r3D b3aR@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            It would be a hard-sell these days to charge someone to gamble on whether or not their content is going to get any views. My guess is that the conent economy et al is like an iceburg, it takes a lot to float it but only a little bit is worth seeing the light of day. Ie, you have to host a ton of garbage to be able to sift out the gems.

            • linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Hard sell maube but they’re the only game in town. I suspect it’s not a matter of if but when.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    And it still doesn’t have sponsorblock. Free is more feature rich than paid. Hahaha

  • eskimofry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 months ago

    This “Article” is short on details, And according to this article Google did not reveal data about subscriptions in the recent earnings call. I can only think this a PR piece to fluff up Google’s shares and discourage critics. Unless Google can be confident enough to explain which regions added subscribers and how much of such a subscription was part of a bundle… We can’t conclude that their anti-adblocking measures and price hikes were successful.

    Example: India would fluff up numbers without adding as much revenue (bundles are common and subscription prices are low) than NA or EU

    • eskimofry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      We can’t really tell for sure because:

      1. They left out subscriber numbers in the recent earnings call (according to this article)
      2. Hence, we don’t know if the subscribers were from bundles vs. individual subscriptions.
      3. Subscribers could be from low price regions and the revenue there wouldn’t compare to NA and EU.
    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      and probably more than a few upsells from cross-marketing a yt ‘premium’ sub to those that came over from satellite for nfl games.

  • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s over a billion dollars a month. If they’re still operating at a loss with all that then it’s their own incompetence at fault.

  • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    How many of those subscribers are like me, definitely watching YouTube from Argentina.

  • Kyouki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    marketing tactics to get even more to subscribe, ala “x amount of people got it so it must be good”.

    Yet it feels like I got better things to spend it on, as I don’t watch much anymore due to algorithm changes making me miss the prior new music uploads and or newer channels to discover.

    Every refresh contains the same or prior channels watched with the same content shuffled or worse, suggest old dated watched videos.

    • graymess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Meanwhile I’m thinking “ey, sounds like they’re getting enough money, now maybe they can leave me the fuck alone.”

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I do have YouTube Premium, because between the ad-free movies and TV shows and the music, the family sharing option was cheaper than Spotify and a couple of streaming services we gave up, and the few new content creators I do watch get paid more. But if they keep raising the price, I’ll look for something else.

    • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      For me, almost all the media I consume is YouTube so I’m fine paying up to a point but if it goes past 20 without a heap more features I’m out. I was already shocked they took away “continue watching” from normal users.

    • SeabassDan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I had to get grayjay because revanced stopped working on an A13, but I can’t seem to find an auto play feature

  • mihies@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I might even consider it out if they weren’t selling me music as well and if there was a family option (in my country). And no, I wouldn’t consider VPN as I won’t do extra work to be able to pay google.

    • FlumPHP@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, as someone who gets good mileage with YouTube Premium, I wish they offered a version just for ads without music. YouTube music sucks hard, but I can’t justify paying for another music app on top of it.