• Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Rofl, if this isn’t bullshit, those cops must have either been bored out of their minds or just had a good sense of humor.

    This is the law enforcement equivalent to a little kid yelling “BOO!” at you, and you pretending to be scared.

    “Whaaaaat, you’re arresting -meeee-?!?! Oh noooooo!”

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      You can inform a police officer that he or she is under citizen arrest. You can call the police and have an officer come out with the paperwork, which YOU have to sign. If the arrest is false, YOU are liable both criminally and civilly.

  • derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve been vaccinated for COVID 5 times over the last 3 years, and have received various vaccines over 41 years. Slowest. Euthanasia. Ever.

  • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    As an American: I’m really sorry if we infected you with this particular brand of idiocy. If only there were a vaccine…

    Someone’s going to reply: education is, but I offer PragerU as counter-evidence. There’s a quality scale in education, as well.

      • Chocrates@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You have to either watch them and think critically about the content or be “in the know” through our various lefty podcasters and what not though. Prager U does a decent job of hiding that it is propaganda imo. Though I don’t know that I have ever watch a full video myself.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Years ago, I would keep YouTube playing constantly while I was at work and caught a handful of Prager u videos randomly, and this was well before I was the radical leftist I am now, they still rubbed me the wrong way. They did a great job making an argument that was fundamentally wrong but they’d always fail to explain an important mechanism for something critical. I can’t think of any specific examples, I haven’t actually watched one of their videos since I left that job. But it was always a huge leap that they disguised as a given fact. They’re also just straight up lie about historical facts.

          • Chocrates@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s the problem right!? It takes no effort to lie but we have spill gallons of ink to fact check them.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The best propaganda is simply the slice of truth you choose to show that supports your original claims.

        It is trivially easy to dig up instances of this or that medication having complications or side-effects. And I’ll openly admit that COVID boosters still leave me feeling like shit for a day afterwards. So folks at Praeger can pull together an assortment of anecdotes and testimonials to build an anti-vax case that is entirely “true” while still being complete bullshit by way of omission.

        That’s where the whole “getting educated” stuff is a double-edged sword. You can very easily feel well-informed based on the volume of information - true, legitimate, seriously sourced information, confirmable facts - you’ve ingested, and still be lead to some utterly false conclusions.

        You can play this game with Tylenol or Chemotherapy or Dialysis as easily as any vaccine. And I do get the sense that, as the UK moves towards divesting itself of a health care infrastructure because shit costs money, we’re going to get more and more of this kind of “Don’t even bother going to a doctor, they’ll kill you!” medical denialism as a kind-of coping mechanism for a health care system that’s been defunded to the point of uselessness.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          It is trivially easy to dig up instances of this or that medication having complications or side-effects.

          The problem is that when this evidence is mildly negative against vaccination (e.g. myocardial cases in young males) it is denied rather than debated.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            myocardial cases in young males

            26.7 out of 100,000 cases after the second vaccine dose

            Like, on the one end, this is exactly the kind of shit that gets hyper-inflated. The mortality rate of COVID is closer to 2000 cases in 100k than 26.7. And contraction of COVID raises long term risk of heart issues as a consequence. The herd immunity to grants means that, if you can successfully identify high risk individuals, they’re insulated from transmission by the bulk of the population getting vaccinated. So the fear of heart issues is mitigated only when everyone else gets the jab.

            On the other, I think there’s a criticism that we haven’t continued to invest in improvements to the mRNA treatment now that we have a simple panacea. And this doesn’t become criticism of vaccination. It becomes a criticism of vaccine skepticism undermining funding of new iterations of the treatment.

            it is denied rather than debated

            At some point, you can’t keep coming back to the debate table in the middle of a pandemic. You need to move quickly and confidently, rather than re-litigating age old talking points if you want to minimize total public harm.

            That might mean ramping up vaccine distribution. It might mean ramping up quarantine measures. It might mean dramatically expanding the availability of testing and contact tracing and improving access to public health care.

            But when we’ve embraced a “cheapest, least economically invasive solution” policy method, that means we’re fully on board with the vaccine whether its entirely safe or not. Because what we really care for, in the US, is economic growth. And a jab from even a mediocre vaccine solution is going to be vastly more friendly to the economy than doing nothing or doing a more traditional quarantine approach.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              The mortality rate of COVID is closer to 2000 cases in 100k than 26.7.

              Ok. So my post was bait. I specifically chose a statistic of young males and myocarditis.

              As expected you misread and responded quoting all age mortality.

              This was the point I was trying to make. Honest discussions are impossible.

              contraction of COVID raises long term risk of heart issues

              Above a certain age, yes.

              Your link is not focused on young males.
              In the specific case of myocarditis in young males, the Pfizer vaccine is higher risk.

              The herd immunity to grants means that, if you can successfully identify high risk individuals, they’re insulated from transmission by the bulk of the population getting vaccinated.

              True for vaccines in general, but for omicron (the dominant strain when most vaccines were given) transmission rates immediately after infection were the same, whether vaccinated or not.

              So the fear of heart issues is mitigated only when everyone else gets the jab.

              Not empirically true for covid vaccines

              On the other, I think there’s a criticism that we haven’t continued to invest in improvements to the mRNA treatment now that we have a simple panacea.

              Disagree. mRNA is now an accepted tool and is being explored for a huge number of medical applications.

              you can’t keep coming back to the debate table in the middle of a pandemic.

              There was no debate during the pandemic. Any criticism was silenced as being anti vaccine.

              You need to move quickly and confidently,

              In public. But this shouldn’t apply to doctors, scientists and other experts.

              But when we’ve embraced a “cheapest, least economically invasive solution” policy method,

              Cheapest would have been open sourcing the Oxford vaccine. Bill Gates stopped that from happening. “As a CEPI founder he had leverage”

              Because what we really care for, in the US, is economic growth.

              Yes. There is no money in an open source, cost of production vaccine, but there is a LOT of money in future mRNA applications.

              EDIT: Links added.

    • Shou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Don’t worry. My country’s bible belt has been used in epidemic studies for measles long ago. It’s not just 'Murica.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I frequently have youtube up on my TV for background noise.

      PragerU and those AI generated ads talking about free money are things I see far to frequently, and make me far too irrationally angry.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’d honestly be surprised if the whole concept doesn’t predate the US as a country.

      • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean the methods to immunize someone was very crude and the entire concept so new that I really don’t think you can compare that to anti-vaxxers nowadays. We’ve got much bigger idiots now.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Oh, I’m talking about the sovereign citizen nonsense, which I gathered from the “I arrested the police” bits.

  • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Anti-vax sovcit? Mark my words - with that level of conspiracism and entitled self-victimisation, they’ll be a full-blown Nazi by the end of the year.

    It’s always the Jews with these fuckers.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well if they didn’t have fucking SPACE LASERS pointed at my favorite PIZZA PLACE.

      Let’s do the math here people. P. I. Z. Z. A. What ELSE has 2 Z’s??? That’s right. Nazzis. They’re extra Nazi. And the only way to fight nazzis is with Nazïsm. We need all the Nazis we can get to fight the Jewish space cosmonauts, who will break open the fermament and send us all careening in to the great blue void.

  • Lath@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The situation is dumb, but citizen’s arrest in general is covered by laws in some counties, UK being among them.
    In specific situations, a random person on the street can arrest a criminal lawfully.

      • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        If you did that, good luck in court proving that you had the right to arrest them in the first place while you’re getting sued.

    • bigbluealien@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is the UK law for citizens arrest really the most important difference between this and a police arrest is the police can arrest you with the intention of finding out IF a crime has been commited, whereas you must know a crime has been commited by the person you’re arresting, otherwise it’s just kidnapp

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Absolutely, they can. I did it several times as a security person at Walmart. The biggest difference is that a citizen does not have immunity to being sued, and a citizen can not transport. You better be damn sure you’re right, or you’re getting sued into oblivion.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m trying to figure out their logic, they identify as a non-U.S. citizen, but believe they have jurisdiction to make arrests in another country? What is the plan? To detain or abduct members of a foreign country? I’m fairly certain that would be considered an act of war. Better make sure he isn’t armed or he’ll trigger article 5 of NATO and he’ll be at war with several countries.

    • elrik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve been vaccinated multiple times and each time I died within a year later. /s

  • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    American here, how do you de - arrest someone? Over here once you’re arrested only a judge // jury can say you’re not guilty, the person that made the arrest, or the police don’t have any say in that part of the criminal justice system.

    • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If you’re de-arrested you’re not locked in a cell (custody). If you’re released after questioning it’s being de-arrested. If you’re held in a cell during any of it you can’t be de-arrested, you have to be “released without charge”.

      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-magazine-monitor-29784497

      “de-arrested” is not technically the same as “released without charge”. The key difference in terminology is whether the person is taken into custody and processed, says a spokesman for the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo).

      https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/mar/01/law.emmabrockes

      TLDR:

      • Arrest - copper has you.
      • De-arrest - Copper lets go.
      • Released without charge - Released from police custody cell (jail) after an arrest.
      • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        That can and does happen, but it’s still a process that takes months at minimum. Months that your either sitting in jail, or if you’re one of the privileged, you’d be sitting out on bail, possibly on house arrest depending on if the judge set any conditions to your release upon bail.

      • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s different than being arrested. Police can hold you for like 24 hours without charging you with anything. Once your officially charged and arrested it’s in the system and goes at the speed of the system.

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          The opposite of arresting someone is to release them, and police can do it.

          Charging someone with a crime is a separate process done by the prosecutor’s office. They can also drop charges.

    • iamanurd@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      As a fellow US citizen, my American brain can also not comprehend this. How do you de-shoot someone?!

    • PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      It happens all the time. Officer makes the decision to arrest, puts the person in handcuffs and the car. A supervisor shows up, a story gets changed, or an officer finds out that something proves someone is lying, and the person is released. I’ve seen it happen when a non-violent offender had warrants, but it turned out they were having a kid’s birthday party (discovered when the dad came out to check on the mom because she’d been outside ‘smoking’ for longer than usual).

      Arrested is a step up from detention. Detention = you’re not free to leave. Arrested = you are not free to go, you’re coming with the officer to jail, and they have belief you committed a crime that you will be charged with (or have a warrant, thus already charged). There is nothing that says once arrested an officer can’t take off handcuffs and let you go. There really isn’t that much distinguishing the two in the law, except for statutes about identifying yourself (where I live, anyway). My laws use the word custody in far greater amounts than arrest.

    • SeabassDan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The police showed their BOFA docs and he was pretty much forced to do so, it wasn’t necessarily his choice here.

  • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I really really really wish these people would try this to cops in America. The more dead anti-vaccine morons, the better.