• ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      We call him that sarcastically but idiots see it and think “he really is!” Free speech silencer should come up whenever someone searches for Elon Musk.

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    8 months ago

    So genders are a slur now? Guess it’s they/them for everyone. Can’t be racist if you’re neutrally wrong.

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      We could also just change the terms. Transgender becomes heterogender, and cisgender becomes homogender. Bit of a mouthful but since homo and hetero are in the common vernacular, it’s bound to erase all confusion that cis- and trans- comes with.

    • FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      8 months ago

      Actually I unironically think this is right. Sexuality is a spectrum right? Then stop adding more and more stupid labels that just divide people and are wrong half the time anyway.

      • chlopczyca@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Good call, that’s why I refuse to learn people’s names. It’s just a stupid label I might get wrong sometimes and divides people, so why would I bother learning someone’s name?

        (I’m being sarcastic, labels and pronouns are not this complex, just call people what they ask to be called)

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Gender isn’t sexuality.

        The prefixes cis- and trans- are rooted in Latin, and is commonly used in chemistry to describe the geometry of a molecule. The terms mean “this side of” and “opposite side of” respectively. It’s the same trans you see in “transatlantic”, as in “far side of the atlantic ocean”, and indeed the word “cisatlantic” is also in the dictionary.

        So that’s precisely what trans-and-cisgender means. A cisgender person is someone who identifies “on the same side” of the gender they were assigned at birth, ergo they identify as their birthgender.

        They’re not terms you need to identify with or use. They’re simply terms used to make a clear distinction in conversation where such a distinction is necessary.

    • macniel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t like sex. Never did and never will. So I demand it to banned!

          • null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Just saying that if the LGBTQI+ community doesnt like a word, it very quickly becomes unacceptable to use. But if I dont like a word I get told to suck it up because thats what I am…

            “When a marginalized group doesn’t like being called something deliberately hurtful, it becomes unacceptable. But how come no one cares that I don’t like how a word sounds phonetically?? That’s the same!!”

              • null@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                8 months ago

                Because the word is “cisgender” and there’s no world where its a slur.

                You just don’t like how it sounds. It doesn’t marginalize or harm you in any way.

                When you act pissy that you don’t get to play at being a marginalized group, you should expect to be told off.

          • Dojan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            I suppose technically instead of transgender we could use heterogender, meaning we’d say homogender instead of cisgender. The only time you’d use these terms (and similar ones, like AFAB/AMAB) is in specific situations where the nuance distinguishing the two matters.

            You don’t have to use the terms either. It’s fully acceptable to just call people men and women, particularly in contexts where their assigned sex doesn’t matter, which I’d wager for most people is pretty much all the time.

              • Jaytreeman@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                It sounds like your reasoning is similar to how a lot of people feel about the word ‘moist’.

                I wouldn’t be happy if the descriptor for me was viscerally hurtful to myself.

                I think the big difference is the world we live in. Lgbtq+ are being targeted by rightwing fucks all over the world. Talking about how you don’t like the word sounds a lot like ‘Im just asking what a woman is’. It’s not exactly transphobic, but those phrases are often used by people trying to legitimize their hate. For example, take a look at JKRs change in rhetoric.