@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 1 month agoNoisemander.xyzimagemessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1901arrow-down122
arrow-up1879arrow-down1imageNoisemander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-square@ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglish12•1 month agoIs it possible to record those higher frequencies and then turn them down so I can hear how noisy it is for my dog at home?
minus-square@Etterra@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish8•1 month agoProbably. If astronomers can convert the radio noise stars make into audible sound - and they can - then I don’t see why we couldn’t pitch adjust background noise to human-audible levels.
minus-square@rhandyrhoads@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish7•1 month agoI’m not 100% on the pitching down bit, but key would be to get a mic that has those frequencies in its range.
minus-square@ProgrammingSockslinkEnglish5•edit-21 month agoYou also need to have a sampling rate that’s equal to 2x the highest frequency you want to capture.
Is it possible to record those higher frequencies and then turn them down so I can hear how noisy it is for my dog at home?
Probably. If astronomers can convert the radio noise stars make into audible sound - and they can - then I don’t see why we couldn’t pitch adjust background noise to human-audible levels.
I’m not 100% on the pitching down bit, but key would be to get a mic that has those frequencies in its range.
You also need to have a sampling rate that’s equal to 2x the highest frequency you want to capture.