@rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 1 month agoRustulesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1256arrow-down10
arrow-up1256arrow-down1imageRustulesh.itjust.works@rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 1 month agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-square@svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink13•1 month agoRust probably stabilise some of its experimental features before we can rewrite the world with it. Const generics for one. (I’d help out with the implementation if I could…)
minus-squarePloplinkfedilink3•1 month agoConst generics are already stable. Do you mean const inline or const expressions on type level?
minus-square@svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink4•1 month agoSorry, I was thinking of other features covered by the Const Generics Project Group, like generic_const_exprs.
minus-squarePloplinkfedilink2•1 month agoHas there been any progress on that? The projects repo seems somewhat dead.
minus-square@svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink3•1 month agoThere seems to be a couple of people keeping the lights on at the project zulip but they are presumably busy with other things.
minus-squarePloplinkfedilink2•1 month agoAh okay! Would love to see a stable generic_const_expr one day.
Rust probably stabilise some of its experimental features before we can rewrite the world with it. Const generics for one. (I’d help out with the implementation if I could…)
Const generics are already stable. Do you mean const inline or const expressions on type level?
Sorry, I was thinking of other features covered by the Const Generics Project Group, like generic_const_exprs.
Has there been any progress on that? The projects repo seems somewhat dead.
There seems to be a couple of people keeping the lights on at the project zulip but they are presumably busy with other things.
Ah okay! Would love to see a stable generic_const_expr one day.