• knightly the Sneptaur
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    There’s no benefit there that would be useful to anyone. If you need a public ledger then you can just do that and skip the crypto BS

      • knightly the Sneptaur
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Public ledgers predate crypto BS by decades and are not improved by cryptographic chaining between entries.

        • Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          And what about ledger that use DAG instead of blockchain, did they exist pre crypto BS?

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yea, I was talking about a public ledger where the people ruled by the government host nodes and verify that laws and other stuff decided by the government are all stored there to make it harder for politicians to lie because everyone has the truth and can verify it.

      Well something like this, I am not an expert in this, but I can imagine it having a use case there

      • knightly the Sneptaur
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I am an expert in this and cryptographic chaining of a public ledger is like large language models, interesting but ultimately useless.

        • Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I would not say that LLM are useless, just a bit overhyped

          I am way more efficient in learning to code having this text bot give me explanations e.g. what which kernel API does

          • knightly the Sneptaur
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            But you have to check to make sure the chatbot isn’t hallucinating the answers it gives you, so you could be even more efficient by just looking it up in the first place and skipping the extra step.

            • Petter1@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Well, I just run the code and see if it works, in like 97% (or even more) of the time, it works as the bot said.