MeldrikM to Facepalm@lemmy.wtf • 29 days agoThanks, UPS!lemmy.wtfimagemessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up1746arrow-down150
arrow-up1696arrow-down1imageThanks, UPS!lemmy.wtfMeldrikM to Facepalm@lemmy.wtf • 29 days agomessage-square99fedilink
minus-squareYeetPicslinkfedilink-1•edit-229 days ago house Not quite a high occupancy building imo. Codes are different (and actually enforced) when you have one property owner and dozens if not hundreds of tenants who all can sue the owner at a whim (in the US, anyhow).
minus-square@intensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilink1•28 days agoSituations vary and as satisfying as it is to appear to know it all, one doesn’t due to the large variety of how things are throughout the world.
minus-squareYeetPicslinkfedilink0•27 days agoThis post gives us a precise situation and the regulations are also very specific. It’s not a hard conclusion to arrive at.
Not quite a high occupancy building imo.
Codes are different (and actually enforced) when you have one property owner and dozens if not hundreds of tenants who all can sue the owner at a whim (in the US, anyhow).
Situations vary and as satisfying as it is to appear to know it all, one doesn’t due to the large variety of how things are throughout the world.
This post gives us a precise situation and the regulations are also very specific.
It’s not a hard conclusion to arrive at.