• @thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3221 days ago

    Provide me with a complete experience out-of-the-box as an end-user (you know how it should be done, developers - it’s the way things were before the PS3/XBox 360 era), don’t try to nickel & dime me with ‘micro-transactions’ or ‘battle passes’, or scam me with multiple ‘expansions’ every year… and then, and only then, we can talk.

    $60 USD in 2000 is worth about $110 now; so there’s room to negotiate - but it needs to be in good faith, and I don’t trust publishers to do so currently.

    • lemmyng
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1921 days ago

      It also has to be fully functional offline. I don’t want to be locked out because someone’s login server is down.

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1721 days ago

      That’s where I am at. Want more money? Release a full complete game. BG3 honestly I could pay 100 for and feel content. RDR2 same deal. Those are complete games, and are worth it.

      This Ubisoft trash coming out? 20. Tops.

      • @thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        521 days ago

        Indies are honestly the only thing keeping me in this hobby; well that and retro collecting…

        A game like Vampire Survivors has given me hundreds of hours of entertainment and value for a fraction of the cost of a single “AAA” game - even factoring in the handful of expansion packs he’s released.

        • Scrubbles
          link
          fedilink
          English
          521 days ago

          The major publishers declared strategy and top down games dead, but factorio and other small indie games gmhave kept me on for thousands of hours

      • @glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        221 days ago

        I’ve never regretted buying a game full price less than BG3. My baseless rule of thumb for value is that $1 should get you an hour of fun and I’ve got like 400 hours in that game

      • @thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        Corporations are beholden to their shareholders, yes - but the issue is more down to the fact that we seem to have forgotten that shareholders have the intellect of a toddler… give them free reign and they’ll eat pure sugar for dinner and then complain about a tummy ache.

        The line can still go up by delivering quality experiences (as mentioned elsewhere: BG3, RDR2 & hopefully GTA6); by taking care of your stakeholders (which includes employees and customers), it results in higher long-term returns for everyone.

        But again, shareholders are toddlers and the current system is giving them free reign.

        • Track_Shovel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 days ago

          The line can still go up by delivering quality experiences (as mentioned elsewhere: BG3, RDR2 & hopefully GTA6); by taking care of your stakeholders (which includes employees and customers), it results in higher long-term returns for everyone.

          Hilarious. Now pay $30 mo for our add free version of this game.