@renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish • 11 days agoAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square131fedilinkarrow-up11.22Karrow-down123cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.2Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.world@renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish • 11 days agomessage-square131fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
minus-square@schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink3•11 days agoYes and it is a good thing we don’t anymore.
minus-square@sik0fewl@lemmy.calinkfedilink16•11 days agoWhy? JSON hasn’t given us anything XML hasn’t, except maybe a bit of terseness. I do agree SOAP is a bit over engineered, though, but that’s not the fault of XML.
minus-square@0xD@infosec.publinkfedilink1•11 days agoAs a pentester, if I see XML in HTTP I start crying.
We were using XML for that before JSON.
Yes and it is a good thing we don’t anymore.
Why? JSON hasn’t given us anything XML hasn’t, except maybe a bit of terseness.
I do agree SOAP is a bit over engineered, though, but that’s not the fault of XML.
XML is much more annoying to read/write by hand
As a pentester, if I see XML in HTTP I start crying.