cmeerw@programming.dev to C++@programming.devEnglish · edit-22 months agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ blueprintwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up138arrow-down12cross-posted to: programming@programming.devhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up136arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ blueprintwww.theregister.comcmeerw@programming.dev to C++@programming.devEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square40fedilinkcross-posted to: programming@programming.devhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squareHerzenscheinlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-22 months agoWhile the summary + interview The Register did was decent, when you read the actual paper, the proposal is way more interesting. Not a fan of mut instead of just plain mutable, though. Also I sure hope the compiler messages for this feature won’t be like the circle examples in the proposal in the end.
While the summary + interview The Register did was decent, when you read the actual paper, the proposal is way more interesting.
Not a fan of mut instead of just plain mutable, though.
Also I sure hope the compiler messages for this feature won’t be like the circle examples in the proposal in the end.