• ThrowawayOnLemmy
    link
    fedilink
    42
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I mean, I like to think Sony made it perfectly clear this time around. There’s really no excuse this time. People were warning other people, Sony had it on the system requirements sheet, and Steam had it listed as soon as the page went up. So if you still picked up the game and then decided to bitch about the PlayStation Network requirement because you didn’t know, that’s on you.

    Flipside, if you bought the game just to bitch about the PlayStation network requirement, knowing full well this would be a requirement, you’re way more privileged than me. When I don’t like how someone does something, I typically don’t give them money unless I don’t have a choice.

    • @helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      128 hours ago

      You don’t need to be “privileged”. You buy the game, play it for an hour, leave a negative review, then refund it.

    • @stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      4011 hours ago

      Honestly I appreciate them buying it and expressing the disappointment in Steam reviews. It is the best way to get attention to it since people aren’t going to refrain from buying it. Boycotts don’t work so people expressing their thoughts is the best we got.

      • @ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        30
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        “boycotts don’t work” lmao

        The gaming community is incapable of executing an effective boycott because they cannot go 5 minutes without the thing they like. So they’ll pre-order garbage, never learn their lesson, and complain the whole time while paying a premium, instead of exercising restraint and playing something else - like one of their 4,000 unplayed games in their bought library.

        • @stardust@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          13 hours ago

          If people don’t refrain from buying then boycotts won’t work. Gaming community is more effective at creating noise than not buying a product they want.

        • @moody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          107 hours ago

          Boycotts only work when the group boycotting is large enough to impact the bottom line.

          Most gamers just don’t care enough about accounts and launchers to boycott a game or company. They just want to come home from work and play games.

        • TheTechnician27
          link
          fedilink
          139 hours ago

          Yeah, they left off the rest of that lesson, which is “boycotts don’t work if you don’t fucking do them”. Boycotts work when they happen, and it’s still a good thing to personally boycott a game you feel isn’t up to your standards even if the broader community isn’t, but it’s been consistently shown nonetheless that gamers are horrible at wide-scale boycotts.

          • @stardust@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            13 hours ago

            What do you think I meant by people won’t refrain from buying. People not buying products they weren’t going to buy anyways isn’t a boycott. Do you trust the gaming community to actually not buy something they want?

            People are misunderstanding that boycotts won’t work in this case means a boycott isn’t going to happen.

    • PonyOfWar
      link
      2311 hours ago

      Steam refunds are easy and convenient. I wouldn’t personally bother doing that just to post a “protest review” either, but it’s definitely possible to do without losing any money.

    • @tehcooles@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      1010 hours ago

      This is my exact reaction. The issue with HD2 was the bait and switch of adding the requirement at a later date, particularly since they had already sold copies in places where people literally could not make PSN accounts.

      Not that I agree with Sony’s decision to require the account for GOW, but at least they’re being up front about it this time. If you don’t want the account, there are 500 billion other quality games you can buy that don’t require one.

        • PonyOfWar
          link
          48 hours ago

          Technically yes, but they didn’t actually require it in the beginning and they even sold it in regions without PSN.

          • @helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            37 hours ago

            It had it in the beginning. They disabled it because it was adding to the long list of technical issues.

            Which is yet another reason not to have it in the first place.

    • Fogle
      link
      fedilink
      110 hours ago

      Could be people who already have the PSN account. Linking it was never the problem. I don’t want the account

    • @SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -610 hours ago

      It was also perfectly clear the first time, the CEO of Arrowhead chose to not make the information as readily available as HE should have. Sonys always had the same stance, but one CEO decided to try and stick it to them, and unfortunately, it worked, but they likely won’t get more work.

      He chose to turn the requirement off to fix a glitch on their system. It was a requirement, it was listed, Arrowhead is wholefully to blame

      • @krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -2
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Who gives a shit. Arrowhead made a good game. Fuck Sony. No one wants your dumbass PSN account.

        • @SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -4
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          They also willfully broke their contract obligations, the game was only made because of the investment by Sony as well. So they took their money and gave them the middle finger and got their fan bases to bash Sony when it was their doing. But sure make fun of an account I guess?