• Bappity
      link
      fedilink
      English
      60
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      this is the most batshit insane proposal… I hope nobody supports it

      • @sci@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3211 months ago

        if google microsoft and apple support it, that already covers over 90% of the market

        • @Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2211 months ago

          that’s exactly what people said with manifest V3 then all the sudden they were getting strikes on youtube for having their ad blocker on

          • @AceSLS@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1211 months ago

            And how well did that work out? I personally haven’t gotten any strike on youtube, using uBlock/mpv on PC, Youtube Revanced on mobile and SmartTube for TV since forever

            Also there’s this https://invidious.io/. So yeah, it’s just the classic cat & mouse game that has been going on for ever since software added drm

              • @AceSLS@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                611 months ago

                Google has no ground to stand on against Invidious

                They may harass them but it’ll be veeery difficult to chase down all instances

                  • @HelloHotel@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    Steamrolling this change Forcing people to have an incredably invasive change to force you to use chrome or use googled android, or use googled chromebooks.

                    its incredably bright lines it would destablize trust in anything that agrees with it. If the amrican court doesnt prosecute. It will eather show the ignorance/lies in others or destablize amarican trust in the law.

            • @Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              111 months ago

              It’s probably a slow roll out for exact cases like this one to ease the backlash. I havent gotten any notice like such either but Im on Firefox. I do fully support invidious though

    • @HelloHotel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      Notice they are DRMing text and computer code, WSJ and malware brokers are gonna really happy, everyone else had their DRM fix with multimedia

      • @azuth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1711 months ago

        Ads. To be precise this on it’s own provides a way for servers to be certain of the environment the pages run (browser, plugins, os). Protecting ads or other functions come from servers refusing unattested configurations or configurations they don’t like (i.e. running adblock, running firefox, running linux).

        • @spiderman@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          911 months ago

          if chrome fully adapts this, this might well be a full blown commerical by chrome for people to switch to firefox. i have been only using chrome only to run our projects locally and test it out.

        • baltakatei
          link
          fedilink
          English
          511 months ago

          It should be noted that “being certain of the environment the pages run” requires controlling the client software being executed which requires preventing the user from modifying said executable which requires the browser to either be closed source or, more effectively, controlling the user’s hardware via blackbox verification chips (e.g. TPM DRM). It’s not just advertisers that would benefit but any website that wants to DRM content.

      • @AceSLS@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        611 months ago

        I’d guess it’s first gonna be used for streaming TV shows and such. After that it’ll probably be used for absurd things

        • @spiderman@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1111 months ago

          I’d guess it’s first gonna be used for streaming TV shows

          I thought they were already being protected by DRM.

          • @AceSLS@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            411 months ago

            Kinda, but it doesn’t work very well. Using video download manager you can download pretty much every video from the web

            • @spiderman@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              311 months ago

              Can you recommend me one that can be used to download DRM protected content from OTT platforms such as Netflix, Amazon Prime and Mubi? Might well as archive the content I watch.

              • @AceSLS@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                611 months ago

                Sadly I can’t, netflix won’t let me watch anything on Librewolf/Firefox on linux. I’d recommend looking into getting a good proxy, a Jellyfin server and also the *arr stack (Sonarr, etc…)

                  • @AceSLS@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    311 months ago

                    Yes, personally I use ProtonVPN. Iirc they don’t care about copyright laws because they don’t really apply in their country, I might be wrong though

                    Also make sure your ip doesn’t get leaked by your torrent client

      • @HelloHotel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 months ago

        Malware, malware encrypts its code so researchers cant crack into it and antivirus cant anilize it. Google is accedentally sponsoring malware