@sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish • 11 months agoMozilla officially opposes Web Enviroment Integrity API (DRM for web pages proposal from Google)github.comexternal-linkmessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up11.42Karrow-down115cross-posted to: degoogle@lemmy.mlwebdev@programming.devfirefox@fedia.iotechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.4Karrow-down1external-linkMozilla officially opposes Web Enviroment Integrity API (DRM for web pages proposal from Google)github.com@sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish • 11 months agomessage-square130fedilinkcross-posted to: degoogle@lemmy.mlwebdev@programming.devfirefox@fedia.iotechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.ml
minus-square@Brahm1nmam@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-211 months agoI get it costs money to develop accessibility, but you can’t rip off a blind man if he can’t navigate your sight. I truly don’t get it. Edit: site, not sight
minus-square@jumperalex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•11 months agoI want to laugh but … well … I’m not crying YOU’RE CRYING
minus-square@Eranziel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•11 months agoThey’ve simply run the numbers and decided it would cost more to support the blind man’s access than they could get from plundering the blind man.
I get it costs money to develop accessibility, but you can’t rip off a blind man if he can’t navigate your sight. I truly don’t get it.
Edit: site, not sight
I want to laugh but … well … I’m not crying YOU’RE CRYING
They’ve simply run the numbers and decided it would cost more to support the blind man’s access than they could get from plundering the blind man.