• @TheColonel@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    5111 months ago

    1000%.

    I’ve noticed across platforms, posts, texts, etc.

    My guess is that there’s been a slow infiltration of “AI powered” autocorrect across the industry.

    Other than that, I don’t really have a good answer to the broad, sweeping degradation of autocorrect.

    But you’re definitely not the only one.

    • @HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1811 months ago

      I suspect this is what’s happening. They’ve gone from a prescriptive ‘pre-programmed’ autocorrect to a more AI based ‘machine learning’ one. Hopefully this means it’ll eventually improve, although I don’t know why it’s taking so long.

      (I could be wrong about all of this, of course.)

      • @TheColonel@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        1711 months ago

        Yeah, this is precisely what I’ve been thinking.

        I feel like they gathered data, studied it, and wrote a prescriptive autocorrect that IMO was perfectly fine and was still pretty good at catching words I was most likely to use.

        Then, all of a sudden, it turned into fucking scrabble and I find myself going, “WTF are you thinking autocorrect?”

        Not sure when the change started but it’s officially shitty now.

        • Sparky678348
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          At least a couple years ago I’d say, and it affects voice to text recognition as well.

      • @YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        Barring code maintenance, they really had no reason to roll this out until it surpassed the old system. The AI could still train on data gathered while using the old system.

    • @hellishharlot@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      1211 months ago

      It could even be that as more and more of our lives gets funneled into these machines we’re seeing less literacy and therefore more typos to make the algorithms second guess themselves. If 10 users for every 100 type fir instead of for and don’t correct it the algo starts to see that as possible correct