Michael and Catherine Burke allege that the state’s Department of Children and Families discriminated against them for their Catholic viewpoints.

  • @NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    10711 months ago

    This is why LGBTQ rights is so important. Imagine being a foster kids because of the US failed social safety net, only to be re homed in a religious bigoted house?! That’s what the GOP wants for kids.

    • @Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      4511 months ago

      That’s exactly what happened to me as a kid. As a bonus, these religious nutjobs sexually abused their actual kid, and because I was just a foster kid, I wasn’t believed. Thank god my mom was able to get me out of that hell hole, but the trauma it caused me was so deep I didn’t even recognize how deep it was for almost 20 years.

        • @bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          Wait, they’re allowing kids to be removed from foster/adoptive homes and transferred to a religious home? On what grounds and who’s authority?

        • @Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          1911 months ago

          Nah don’t be sorry, just be angry at a system that allows such things, and at a religion that shields such people. I came out okay in the end, because I have a family that loves me and helps support me through my traumas, but I don’t know what happened to their kid, or if they were ever stopped. That’s the part that bothers me. Knowing that those sickos could still be out there presenting themselves as righteous Christians while doing such things.

    • diprount_tomato
      link
      fedilink
      -8411 months ago

      “This is why protecting traditional families is so important. Imagine being a foster kids because of the US failed social safety net, only to be re homed in a LGBT groomer house?! That’s what the GOP wants for kids.”

      I literally just changed two things and it went 180 degrees on the other extremist side of the spectrum. Do with that info as you wish

      • @kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        5511 months ago

        And with such a simple change, you turned it into a disgusting and bigoted lie, when the person you responded to was completely accurate.

      • czech
        link
        fedilink
        43
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Do with that info as you wish

        You mean put it into proper context, look at the stats, and acknowledge you’re full of shit? Sure thing! But you won’t let facts get in the way of your feelings amirite?

      • Unaware7013
        link
        fedilink
        3211 months ago

        Yeah, you can make anything sound bad when you just lie and make shit up.

        • diprount_tomato
          link
          fedilink
          -30
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Could say the same of you calling everyone that points out the dangers of dehumanising “bigots”

          • Unaware7013
            link
            fedilink
            1011 months ago

            You can say anything, that doesn’t make it correct. And it’s funny how people call themselves out, because I only call people exhibiting bigotry bigots.

            If you’re being called a bigot, maybe examine your beliefs and actions. After all, if it smells like shit everywhere you go, it’s probably you.

              • diprount_tomato
                link
                fedilink
                -7
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Good luck thinking looking the other way will make people who you disagree with disappear

            • diprount_tomato
              link
              fedilink
              -1311 months ago

              If thinking having two halves of a country willing to kill each other to be insane makes people call you a bigot, maybe I’m not the one that stinks after all

              • Unaware7013
                link
                fedilink
                411 months ago

                No one thinks you’re a bigot for that belief, climb down off your cross or just be honest about your actions.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        1711 months ago

        You changed two things and into something imaginary. There is no such thing as an “LGBT groomer house.” You can’t force a child to be gay or trans no matter how much you want to.

        You might as well say “only to be rehomed in a dragon’s den.” It would make about the same amount of sense.

      • @NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1311 months ago

        Uhhhh what? One, “traditional families” aren’t anti LGBTQ by default. Second, LGBTQ parents aren’t groomers. (can LGBTQ individuals be terrible humans just like everyone else? Yes!) Third, asking a foster family if they hate LGBTQ people is critical for the safety of foster children because mathematically 10% will be LGBTQ. And since there’s no “Gaydar” to tell you can’t risk putting any child with them!

        You didn’t prove anything except how ignorant you are. Do with that info as you wish

        • @Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          811 months ago

          Pendantic though it may be… 30 percent is more accurate for children in foster care to be LGBTQIA+. Many lose their homes of origin and support BECAUSE they are LGBTQIA+ so the instance is way higher.

          Kind of a no brainer to have homo/transphobic foster parents struck from the rolls. It’s enough to be traumatized once by having your authentic self rejected by a supposed safe haven. Twice is unconscionable.

        • @bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          These boneheads seem to mix up up supportive with grooming. I had a conversation at a bar the other day with some dipshit that said if you support your child coming out as gay or trans, you’re effectively grooming them to be a sexual deviant. They fail to realize that grooming is an active nudge or conditioning in the direction of a desired behavior, whereas being supportive is unconditional love regardless of identity. My buddy’s kid is identifying as a girl atm, and while he and I both think it’s a phase (he’s 15 and just an awkward kid in general), we are supportive of his/her choice.

          On the other hand, there are parents out there that actively nudge their kids into being some brand of queer from a young age (not just in providing an open minded atmosphere, but almost to discerning them gay from a stupid young age) that, to me, begins to cross a line. In my mind, let be kids be kids that become teenagers and then adults, and just support them in their choices while guiding them to be the best person they can be.