The sorry state of streaming residuals shows why SAG and the WGA are striking.

  • @LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    16211 months ago

    Doing some math:

    The writers that were paid $3000 in the story wrote 11/134 episodes or 8.2%

    The episodes are 42 minutes each, round down 2 minutes for skipped credits, divide 3x10^9 by 40 we get:

    75 million episodes streamed (approx)

    If they wrote 8.2 % of those streamed, then they wrote 6.15 million individually streamed episodes.

    So writers got 0.049c per episode streamed or 0.00012c per minute streamed.

    The average American watches 160 minutes of TV Video a day, so round that up to 5000 minutes a month, and say $10 a month per sub on that, we get $10 of revenue for 5000 minutes streamed, or 0.2c per minute.

    So streaming revenue (using the above math and assumptions) would be 0.2c per minute of which the writers of the content that was streamed got 0.00012c or 0.06%.

    Netflix 2023Q2 revenue was 8.18B and expenses were 6.36B.

    https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/NFLX/netflix/revenue

    2018 estimate figures the combined Netflix users streamed 164M hours per day

    https://www.soda.com/news/netflix-users-stream-164-million-hours-per-day/

    14.9Billion hours for that Quarter.

    2018 saw 15.8 Billion annual revenue and 14.2Billion in costs. Gives us an estimate of 3.55B in costs for 1 quarter in 2018

    894B minutes / 3.55 B in costs = 0.397c in costs per minute streamed.

    Out of the 0.397c of costs (0.442c revenue) writers got 0.00012c or 0.0302% of the costs or 0.0272% of the revenue.

      • @theangryseal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2311 months ago

        I had a friend who was in a musicians union back in the 40s and 50s. Funny thing, I had a dream about him last night and I would’ve forgotten completely had you not made this comment.

        He told me a story once. The union got him a gig on television. He was so stoked about it.

        He lost half of his thumb in WWII and was very self conscious about it. The host of the show noticed the black cap he used to cover his thumb and asked him about it. He kindly asked the host to avoid making a thing of it and ask that the cameraman avoid shooting it up close.

        He stepped out on the stage and the host said, “ladies and gentlemen, here’s Buddy, the thumbless wonder.”

        Years and years later that still bothered him. He’s been dead and gone a long time now. He was an awesome dude who ran a guitar shop. His wife left him because he kept giving instruments away and she wanted a better financial future. I used to go to his shop to get strings and half the time he’d say, “They’re on the house buddy. I’ll be dead before they’ll get what I owe ‘em.”

        • @AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          811 months ago

          Thanks for sharing this story. That TV host sounds like an unbelievable asshole, no wonder it stuck with your friend for so long. I can’t fathom what would make a person act like that.

          • @theangryseal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            711 months ago

            I have a cassette full of recordings he gave me somewhere, at least I hope I do. I really need to hunt it and digitize it.

            Dude was awesome.

            His old guitar shop is now a food pantry. He lived in the back room in that tiny, dusty old shop and constantly had people over playing music. He always loved to see me coming because in Appalachia everyone plays bluegrass and I don’t. He wasn’t a huge fan of “the grass” but he played along any way until he shook too bad to do it. He was practically blown in half in the war and the damage got him down when he was older.

            I’d come in and he’d say, “take my strat and show me something.”

            I got my first guitar from him (technically my third but it was the one I learned on). A blue Chinese strat copy called a Lotus. I still have it but I need to reassemble it. God, I should do that. I’d love to hear that nasty buzz again. It’s been nearly 20 years since I played that thing.

            • @grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              411 months ago

              I really need to hunt it and digitize it.

              And upload it to the Internet Archive!

              That reminds me: I have a cassette of parody songs from a local radio station (Fox 97’s Shower Stall Singers) somewhere that might end up lost to history if I don’t find it and upload it.

      • umulu
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        But just like with Netflix, you have alternatives. Either pirate, or use services that pay the artists a little more, like tidal.

        I use tidal, and I must say the only thing they are missing is transferring currently listening music to another device.

        Podcasts I don’t really care about.

        Apart from that, pretty good alternative. And I feel better knowing that I am supporting the artists.

    • @droans@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1211 months ago

      Fwiw, the title is intentionally skewed and wrong. I’m not saying writers shouldn’t be upset because they should, but it is making the situation look much worse than it is.

      The six original writers were paid $3K each in streaming residuals last quarter for Season 1.

      Suits was added to Netflix on June 17th where it streamed for three billion minutes in a single week, June 26 to July 2. Using Nielsen numbers, it streamed for about five billion minutes on Netflix during Q2. Previously it was on Peacock and we don’t have the streaming data for that, but we can assume that it wasn’t anywhere as much. Using the most recent data through July 16, it was seen for a total of 12.8 billion minutes.

      Streaming services also doesn’t pay residuals based on minutes watched, but based on a complicated formula.

      Suits episodes are 42 minutes long, meaning the base annual residual is $10,034. Netflix US has more than 150M subscribers, so the subscriber factor is 150%. Their initial streaming residual payment would be $15K per episode.

      However, that is just the initial payment Netflix needs to make. Subsequent payments for the actual streaming rights per year are adjusted down. This is the first year on Netflix so the residual factor is 45%. This makes the base annual payment $7,448.

      Now, the show was on Netflix for 14 days during the last quarter, making their Q2 residual $286. WGA also imposes a 1.5% union due plus $25 per quarter. This brings the payment per episode down to $256.

    • DMmeYourNudes
      link
      fedilink
      -1211 months ago

      Considering how few of the episodes they wrote, this seems almost reasonable. It would be a better comparison of we could see how much they make compared to TV reruns or home media sales.

      • @ribboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        So about $40k shared among all writers seem almost reasonable had they written all of them, and we keep the same ratio…?

        6k per person for a full season on a really popular hit show seems absurdly low

        • @notatoad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          But we’re not talking about salary here. We’re talking residuals, per quarter, paid on top of the salary they received for the original work.

          For a show that is 13 years old. Collecting $6k per quarter for work you did 13 years ago and that you have to do absolutely nothing for anymore seems pretty good to me?

          There’s a hell of a lot of working class people who would absolutely love to be getting paid like that. Trying to frame this as the working class vs the rich seems really dishonest. Do TV writers even understand what the working class is, or how much we make? I sure as hell don’t collect $6k per quarter for work I did 13 years ago. If I did, I’d be rich.

        • @Pheonixdown@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          Not that I’m trying to still for the corpo here, but this is a per quarter payment. ~$270 per episode from this single quarter just based on viewers from 2 streaming services. We don’t know how much they’ve got paid in aggregate for this single episode.

          Presumably they got something upfront/hourly initially and they’ve been paid residuals for many years, as they did the work in 2011 and episodes have been rerun alot on network tv.

          Idk how much is reasonable for the work they did do but it’s certainly been alot more than this small payment.

          • DMmeYourNudes
            link
            fedilink
            211 months ago

            they’re probably going to make 5k a year for 6 months a work for 30 years from 11 episodes of 1 show. they might be owed more, but there is a ton of missing context around this that passing judgment on what could be a simply outdated contract from before streaming was a major consideration. if this is just a fraction of what an equivalent contribution to a show would have made from TV reruns or home media sales, then there is a conversation to be had, but no one has brought that up.

        • DMmeYourNudes
          link
          fedilink
          011 months ago

          It’s 3k to a few of many writers for 11 total episodes. We don’t know the actual streaming numbers of those exact episodes either. Could they be paid better? Maybe, but no one has compared this to the traditional residuals they did get.