I looked into the lemmy src, and what is supposed to be a CRUD API has several layers of abstraction. Same at work, where we have hexagonally structured apps where following any sort of logic is literally impossible. What are your thoughts?

  • @Stumblinbear
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    I just had a look at the Lemmy source and it seems pretty straightforward, what exactly are you having issues with?

    • CinnamonOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      the fact that there are CRUD COMMON and API crates???

      • key
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        I don’t see the problem with modularizing code. Any proper IDE will make following through the crates as transparent as if it were all in the main src folder. It’s not like there’s some complicated indirection at play or anything, it’s direct references and invocations.

        • CinnamonOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          is it kinda early for them to modularize their code?

          • @recursed@lemmy.recursed.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Given this project has been around for many years, (looking at their releases), I wouldn’t say it’s “early” to modularize their code. It’s very common practice to abstract out / move commonly executed code into their own packages and modules to allow ease of reuse across the app. This way if an entire subpackage needs to be moved or deleted, all related code could be affected at once and code which references it, simply needs to be edited. Typically these places to edit are much easier to handle since most of “calling code” wouldn’t touch the modularized / abstracted code, only their callables.