• @XTornado@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    4710 months ago

    I am fine with it but I feel they should have alternatives. Some people don 't have a device, connection. Or have issues with using technology for whatever reason, being old, incapacitated, etc.

    • geogle
      link
      fedilink
      1210 months ago

      Shit cell service, and an inability to easily take in the menu online are my biggest gripes

      • @IndefiniteBen@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        610 months ago

        If they don’t have a good internet connection available for free for customers with a good mobile website, why would anyone visit and actually struggle through the ordering process?

        • It’s a niche probably imaginary scenario they want to strawman. If a place has shit cell service or no Wi-Fi then they clearly aren’t using QR codes and just shrugging their shoulders confused at every customer.

    • @Stumblinbear
      link
      610 months ago

      There’s a waiter, so I assume you could just tell them you don’t have a phone for it

    • @OmegaII@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      -1310 months ago

      Then they don’t eat there. I don’t see the problem. Might be the owners problem. But hopefully it was taken into cinsideration. If not, though luck again.

      • @iegod@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        1310 months ago

        That’s not quite how accessibility regulations are structured. Wouldn’t surprise me if there are requirements on this in any given jurisdiction. Perhaps not a ‘thou shalt have printed menus’ but some kind of reasonable accommodation I think isn’t absurd.

      • TheHarpyEagle
        link
        fedilink
        510 months ago

        I think it’s pretty reasonable to require restaurants to spend a little money to print menus, and even a little more to get braille ones. There’s millions of people who might have some difficulty or another using a browser based menu, certainly we can do better than saying “sorry, tough luck.”