Would they have all still fought against him?

  • @RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I mean, he could have just created 200% more resources as well. Or he could have equally redistributed all the resources. The problem he was trying to solve would still eventually happen again, because solving the problem relies on everyone working unselfishly, which is simply not possible when humans are involved.

    • @lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I think he should have cut the pregnancy rate to a third of what it is now. No one would notice. No one would die or be missed. There’d just be a lot less people within fifty years.

      • @AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        169 months ago

        OK while that would be a better idea the thought that no one would notice is laughable. We have detailed pregnancy rate records going back 75 years, an immediate 30% change would definitely raise a lot of red flags.

    • @CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      99 months ago

      I think he should have made everyone half size. Then they would have only needed half as many resources plus there’s a little tiny, angry Spiderman jumping around.

      • @MrZee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        I kinda like the idea of randomly distributing how much each person gets shrunk. Each person ends up anywhere from 99.9% to 0.1% of their original size. Think of the added chaos it would create.

          • @MrZee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            Yeah, I feel like it would create a hell of a lot more chaos than half the world disappearing. And hijinks. And genocide.