Reducing the impacts of human-caused climate change through the use of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage – better known as BECCS – could have major consequences for wildlife, forests and water resources, a new study shows.
The large-scale conversion of existing land to BECCS plantations could cause global forest cover to fall by as much as 10% and biodiversity “intactness” to decline by up to 7%, the lead author tells Carbon Brief.
And the introduction of solar geoengineering could also threaten wildlife, a second study shows. The new research finds that implementing – and then not sustaining – such a technology could cause global temperatures to rebound rapidly, leaving many species unable to cope with the sharp change in conditions.
Geoengineering would destroy the world, reduce rainfall, cause shocks to ecosystems, cause droughts and famines, and kill millions of people due to sulfur dioxide pollution. It is literally genocide.
It’s possible to do cloud seeding by shooting sea water into the air, which will likely be necessary as governments and corporations continue to stall fossil fuel reductions.
If geoengineering is framed as only using Sulfur dioxide, yeah of course it’s bad, but we can geoengineer with non-toxic materials too, and that’s worth investigating and using. We already geoengineered ourselves into the situation we’re in, and it’s likely it will have to be a part of the solution as well.
To be fair, releasing sulfur aerosols to emulate volcanic winter isn’t the only type of geoengineering, just the easiest one
Meanwhile, leaving climate change unchecked would… (checks notes)… destroy the world, reduce rainfall, cause shocks to ecosystems, cause droughts and famines, and kill millions of people due to extreme weather events. It is literally genocide.
That’s why I’m fighting for decarbonization. Every accusation is a confession, etc.