Oh no, please continue defending the fetishization of animals like it doesn’t make you look like an animal fucker, it amuses me greatly. :D
See the reality is that jerking it to animals fucking is still jerking it to animals fucking, regardless of whatever fiction you like to tell yourself. See I really don’t care about that last part, the reality is yer still jerking off to animals. Which, again, not all that different from the pedophile who jerks it to loli and justifies it with “akshually she’s a 12000 year old goddess in the form of a 9 year old”. They’re still a pedophile. If you like your fiction you tell yourself to sleep at night, why, good for you champ! Your reality distortion field only covers you, though. Doesn’t mean I have to indulge it. c:
Let me ask you a question, completely off hand, no tricks up my sleeve, just to get a baseline understanding of where you’re coming from so we can have a civil conversation like the adults we are.
Suppose someone thought Mickey Mouse was hot. Would that make them a dogfucker?
Abstracting it also doesn’t change the reality, super chief. Animals are animals and humans are humans, there is no “gotcha” you have to change this fact – not cartoon characters nor catgirls – if you were attracted to humans, you’d jerk off to regular porn featuring humans like the rest of us. But nice try anyways.
And as an aside, I’m guessing you were a big fan of Disney growing up. It’s my personal theory the reason dogfuckers exist is because of shitty parents who park their kids in front of a TV set and let the colorful talking animals raise their children for them in their formative years, which then translates into warped sexual preferences around puberty. That sound about right, champ? You first beat off to a cartoon character? I’m reckoning so.
Wrong on both counts, but as long as we’re making baseless assumptions about each other, I’m betting you also think it’s immoral to be thirsty for anime boobs/tentacles, even if the characters are visibly of age (not my cup of tea but I digress) and/or that sex between two men is unnatural. Am I right? Probably not, but it sure sounds good.
Actually I’m gay, but I can’t blame you for being wrong – you’ve demonstrated a marked habit for it. And now you’re not even trying to refute what I say. That’s okay, I accept your concession. Better luck next time, dogfucker!
When someone’s that deep in a false equivalence, they’re not worth arguing with. You won’t change your mind no matter what I say, so I’ve decided to stop wasting my time feeding the trolls. I hope someday you poke your nose out your front door and realize that what people do and don’t like doesn’t decide whether they’re Bad People™, but for now, good day.
And oh, by the way, I think I can in fact determine that people who fetishize animals or children (either or) are not good people – that’s the nice thing, glaring deficits in a person’s morality that big are kind of hard to miss. :D
Oh no, please continue defending the fetishization of animals like it doesn’t make you look like an animal fucker, it amuses me greatly. :D
See the reality is that jerking it to animals fucking is still jerking it to animals fucking, regardless of whatever fiction you like to tell yourself. See I really don’t care about that last part, the reality is yer still jerking off to animals. Which, again, not all that different from the pedophile who jerks it to loli and justifies it with “akshually she’s a 12000 year old goddess in the form of a 9 year old”. They’re still a pedophile. If you like your fiction you tell yourself to sleep at night, why, good for you champ! Your reality distortion field only covers you, though. Doesn’t mean I have to indulge it. c:
Let me ask you a question, completely off hand, no tricks up my sleeve, just to get a baseline understanding of where you’re coming from so we can have a civil conversation like the adults we are.
Suppose someone thought Mickey Mouse was hot. Would that make them a dogfucker?
Abstracting it also doesn’t change the reality, super chief. Animals are animals and humans are humans, there is no “gotcha” you have to change this fact – not cartoon characters nor catgirls – if you were attracted to humans, you’d jerk off to regular porn featuring humans like the rest of us. But nice try anyways.
And as an aside, I’m guessing you were a big fan of Disney growing up. It’s my personal theory the reason dogfuckers exist is because of shitty parents who park their kids in front of a TV set and let the colorful talking animals raise their children for them in their formative years, which then translates into warped sexual preferences around puberty. That sound about right, champ? You first beat off to a cartoon character? I’m reckoning so.
Wrong on both counts, but as long as we’re making baseless assumptions about each other, I’m betting you also think it’s immoral to be thirsty for anime boobs/tentacles, even if the characters are visibly of age (not my cup of tea but I digress) and/or that sex between two men is unnatural. Am I right? Probably not, but it sure sounds good.
Actually I’m gay, but I can’t blame you for being wrong – you’ve demonstrated a marked habit for it. And now you’re not even trying to refute what I say. That’s okay, I accept your concession. Better luck next time, dogfucker!
I didn’t think “thinking catgirls are cute equals actually literally fucking dogs” dignified a response.
That’s fine, I still accept your concession. :)
When someone’s that deep in a false equivalence, they’re not worth arguing with. You won’t change your mind no matter what I say, so I’ve decided to stop wasting my time feeding the trolls. I hope someday you poke your nose out your front door and realize that what people do and don’t like doesn’t decide whether they’re Bad People™, but for now, good day.
You’re still here?
And oh, by the way, I think I can in fact determine that people who fetishize animals or children (either or) are not good people – that’s the nice thing, glaring deficits in a person’s morality that big are kind of hard to miss. :D
Byebye now! ^^