• MsPenguinette
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    we need to downgrade to a new IPv5 and just add an extra triplet of numbers to IPv4 addresses

    • Moira_Mayhem
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      That’s a pretty good idea actually but may not cleanly translate to existing infrsatructure.

    • Justin
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s only 140 IP addresses per person. With things like microservices and IoT, we have already passed that.

      Every major website uses hundreds of thousands of IP addresses each. Every part of your car has an IP address. Every digital sign in public places have IP addresses. Every electronic lock might have an IP address. Every electronic that you own might already have an IP address. Every light bulb in your house will have an IP address.

      But yeah, IPv6 is needed. The solution I think is not to make ipv6 addresses shorter, but to make DNS ubiquitous.

      • I'm Hiding 🇦🇺
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Every part of your car has an IP address. Every digital sign in public places have IP addresses. Every electronic lock might have an IP address. Every electronic that you own might already have an IP address. Every light bulb in your house will have an IP address

        Yeah, but not a public facing one. My light bulb and your light bulb can both be 192.168.0.27, so long as our WAN IPs are different. I can understand 140 IPs per person being insufficient if every device was publically accessible, but I seriously doubt there has to be 140 telephone lines on the planet for each person.