• @Aux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    78 months ago

    What if you self host in AWS and Amazon decides to fuck you over? What if you decide to self from home and your ISP decides fuck you over? What if? So many what ifs… How do you even live in this world?

    • Amju Wolf
      link
      English
      08 months ago

      When you use a cloud solution (and especially one with a vendor lock in like Amazon) then yeah, you are fucked there too and I’d question why you did it in the first place.

      If you have your own infrastructure - be it a server at home or whatever - then you can always just move it elsewhere, get some other ISP, whatever. There is no lock-in. Inconvenience, sure, but you can migrate elsewhere. That’s just not true about all the other things mentioned, or the friction would be much higher.

      • @Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        Have you actually used anything cloud? Because there’s literally no friction to move things around. Unless you decide to use proprietary features.

        • Amju Wolf
          link
          English
          18 months ago

          With AWS especially there is a shitton of proprietary stuff. Most of the friction is in knowledge however; the cloud environments differ, are configured differently, have different limitations and caveats, etc. Someone who has only ever worked with AWS will have to learn a lot of things anew if they switch. Hell there’s a reason why “AWS engineer” is a dedicated role in some companies.

          Now, if you only manually set up some VMs and configure them like you would a regular server then sure, it’s easy to migrate. But when you are missing 99% of the features of the cloud environment are you actually using it?

          • @Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            For me the purpose of the cloud is the ability to deploy my projects on rented infrastructure independently of the provider. Tools like Terraform and Kubernetes help with the abstraction of providers.

            As for proprietary features I prefer to use open source alternatives like Supabase, which I then can deploy to any cloud and migrate between clouds if needed.

            • Amju Wolf
              link
              17 months ago

              Well then you aren’t probably taking advantage of most of the stuff AWS offers and is actually really good for. Which isn’t really criticism, but then I wouldn’t really call it cloud? It’s more like just infrastructure as a service.

              • @Aux@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                17 months ago

                Infrastructure as a service is literally the definition of a cloud. Everything is just bells and whistles.