@Persona3Reload@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 8 months agoRulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1392arrow-down10
arrow-up1392arrow-down1imageRulelemmy.blahaj.zone@Persona3Reload@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 8 months agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squareMaevelinkfedilink1•8 months agoI’ve seen no compelling evidence of one historical figure called Jesus, nor a star. I’m willing to look at anything new you present. Imo, the veracity of an actual betting isn’t the point. It’s the essence of the teaching, as with Lao Tzi.
minus-square@TotallynotJessica@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•8 months agoMost evidence for historical figures from that long ago is from written accounts. It’s unsurprising that a person like Jesus wouldn’t have physical proof of his existence.
I’ve seen no compelling evidence of one historical figure called Jesus, nor a star. I’m willing to look at anything new you present.
Imo, the veracity of an actual betting isn’t the point. It’s the essence of the teaching, as with Lao Tzi.
Most evidence for historical figures from that long ago is from written accounts. It’s unsurprising that a person like Jesus wouldn’t have physical proof of his existence.