• @Fleur__@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    578 months ago

    Who cares if its not gonna be practical, science funding is good and there are lots of things to be learned even from unsuccessful fusion projects.

    • Lowlee Kun
      link
      fedilink
      English
      268 months ago

      This is the right answer. Humanity should not stop to be curious simply because it does not turn a profit.

        • @cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          68 months ago

          Capitalism is like fire. Let it run free and it will burn your home down, and your family to death. If it’s controlled, and focused however, it will keep them warm, and power your industry.

          Unfortunately, we’ve let capitalism run rampant, and now we need to bring it back under control.

          • @PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 months ago

            Great analogy, but I cant fully agree. It seems to me that capitalism will almost always act the same way, it will always seek out every manipulation and loophole possible to get money into politics and then its good game. The people will never be able to stay as informed and hardworking at voting for right people and policies, as private money will be at buying the worst candidates and policies. Greed is essentially baked into capitalism.

            …Then again what system wont be broken by the worst parts of humanity given enough time. I feel like the constitution should have been more robust, set out ethical guidelines for the country, it would make it so much harder to be a piece of shit and claim you love America at the same time. Especially as I see nationalism as the final nail in our coffin.

            • @SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -18 months ago

              This is not capitalisms fault. It’s weak and corrupt leadership. Leaders who care more about people than power and money are required to keep it in check. Last time I looked they were all doing their own thing and I can’t blame them but still, it would be nice.

              • @PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                28 months ago

                Except it is capitalisms fault. If the capitalist must make more money each year than it did the year before, eventually the only way to make that happen is by influencing elections to get bills passed that bring up the ladder behind you solidifying your monopoly, or by deregulating the market so you can produce more with less.

                • @SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  08 months ago

                  What you’re describing is not only caused by unchecked greed (solved by strong leadership), it’s lazy capitalism. In actual capitalism the business must achieve constant growth yes, but the part people forget is this is supposed to be achieved through innovation and adaptation. If the businesses fails to do this it goes out of business. Capitalism allows for years of decline so long as the business is strong enough to sustain it. What we’re seeing by companies influencing elections is open admission that they are either struggling to produce innovation or they are greedy. Sometimes probably both. If they are innovating like alphabet or meta and they still do it it’s lazy greed plain and simple. Capitalism ends here, strong leadership should start here and push back against it. You could argue this is where democracy is broken because these companies can control the flow of information and will sway public opinion to vote out a politician that doesn’t play their game. Unfortunately this is still poor leadership. A truely good leader will do their job regardless of public opinion or in the face of losing an election.

                  • @PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    28 months ago

                    I think we disagree on one specific point, I believe weak leadership is a guarantee when massive institutions can no longer grow and instead seek to cheat growth through political action. The vote of the people is meaningless when compared to so much capital. I believe it to be inevitable. Sure strong leadership could prevent this, ,but we elect leadership and are easily manipulated.