Do you have a general stance about it?

Once every couple of months I look into the state of both projects and it’s slow but steadily progressing.

I am mainly looking into it because of the file compression. My tests showed that I can save up to 70% in disk space for a jpg image without losing too much information for both formats, avif and jxl. It depends on the images but in general it’s astonishing and I wonder why I still save jpgs in 100% quality.

But, I could also just save or convert my whole library to 70% jpg compression. Any advice?

  • ferret
    link
    fedilink
    English
    227 months ago

    jxl is love. jxl is life (also afaik re-encoding jpeg to jxl is lossless)

    • Yote.zip
      link
      English
      127 months ago

      Yes it’s lossless. JPG->JXL lossless compression is generally 20% savings for free.