Anatoly Karlin @powerfultakes

Replying to @RichardHanania

I’m against legalizing bestiality because the animal consent problem hasn’t been solved, but probably actually will be quite soon thanks to Al (at least for the higher animals with complex languages). So why not wait a few more years. I don’t see disgust as a good reason. It was an evolutionary adaptation of the agricultural era against the spread of zoonotic illnesses, but technology will soon make that entirely irrelevant as well.

  • AVincentInSpace
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like we agree that eating meat is not in and of itself immoral. Good. I agree that the meat industry in the United States is way bigger than it has any right to be and that as a result of that, and of being exclusively profit-driven, it has done quite a number of things that ought to be illegal.

    I have the same problem with puppy mills and designer breeds that I have with CAFOs, but I’ll challenge your point that we shouldn’t own animals. A domesticated dog is no more capable of living independently, and therefore, I’d argue, no more deserving of the right to do so, than a human child.

    • NIB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Killing people is not always immoral, yet you dont see many people advocating murder. But when it comes to meat, it’s a different story.

      If you make a scenario extreme enough, you can debatebro anything. “Would you shoot a baby if you could save the lives of trillions?”. “What about baby Hitler?”. Ultimately all these are meaningless thought exercises. And it is sad that so many people are trying to rationalize and excuse their consumption of meat. But i guess everyone is a product of their environment and meat consumption is normalized in our society.

      A domesticated dog is no more capable of living independently, and therefore, I’d argue, no more deserving of the right to do so, than a human child.

      There wouldnt be any domesticated animals. We help the ones that exist and once they are gone, they are gone. We wont breed more.

      • AVincentInSpace
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        First of all, are you seriously equating eating animals to killing people?

        Second, in your ideal world, humans and animals would have no relations whatsoever? Sounds pretty boring imo

        • NIB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can interact with animals but on a different basis. Instead of imprisoning them in your house, they will be free to come and go.

      • AVincentInSpace
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We help the ones that exist and once they are gone, they are gone. We won’t breed more.

        Domestication isn’t fair to the dogs, sure, fine, whatever. You know what’s really not fair to the dogs? Letting them go extinct because you feel some type of way about how they’re treated.