Rep. Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts and Sen. Peter Welch of Vermont submitted the legislation, named the Inclusive Democracy Act, on Tuesday which would guarantee the right to vote in federal elections for all citizens regardless of their criminal record.

In a statement, Pressley said the legislation was necessary due to policies and court rulings that “continue to disenfranchise voters from all walks of life — including by gutting the Voting Rights Act, gerrymandering, cuts to early voting, and more.” Welch called the bill necessary due to “antiquated state felony disenfranchisement laws.”

In late 2022, approximately 4.6 million people were unable to vote due to a felony conviction, according to a study by the Sentencing Project, a nonpartisan research group. The same study found that Black and Hispanic citizens are disproportionately likely to be disenfranchised due to felony

  • @morphballganon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    807 months ago

    Convicted of drug crime? Should never lose right to vote.

    Convicted of violent crime? Should regain right to vote upon release.

    Convicted of trying to overturn an election? Never get to vote again.

    • @query@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      62
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      They should all be able to vote. From prison, too. The punishment never needs to be to take their voting rights away. If they commit fraud, stop them from committing fraud again.

      • @surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        147 months ago

        I think if you’re overthrowing the government, you’re basically tapping out of the democracy. That’s literally the only crime I could see not being allowed to vote. I also think they should be removed from the country they tried to destroy. But then I have no idea how would they remain detained in that situation.

          • @Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            -4
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            So we just make them legitimate sovereign citizens?

            What happens when they start to organize and try to create a new country within the United States?

            Edit: weird downvotes, I’m asking questions

            • @_dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              97 months ago

              Make a new permanent US penal colony, call it New Australia, located in Texas. TX as been wanting to secede anyway, let’s give them a helping hand. Deport all seditionists there with all visa/passport privileges being revoked.

              And the final chef’s-kiss: Enact all of the cruel immigration laws against New Australia that they’ve been wanting so bad, see how they like it.

              • @Jax@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                27 months ago

                Hmmm, the more I think about it the more I like this plan. I vote for New Australia. It fits U.S. naming conventions too!

            • @Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              57 months ago

              What’s your understanding of “sovereign citizen”? Asking in good faith.

              I mean, we have Amish in the US. That’s a kind of sovereign citizen, right?

              • @ryathal@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                17 months ago

                The Amish are just members of a fairly extreme religion. They don’t reject the existence of government itself. Sovereign citizens are people that believe they aren’t subject to the laws of the country the reside in.

              • @Jax@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                17 months ago

                Well I’m basing it off of the google definition…

                Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent.

                I mean we’d basically be making them the same thing, no? Only legitimate?

      • @logicbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        67 months ago

        I’d prefer compulsory voting from all able people of voting age. Prisons should have full in-person voting locations with private voting booths. Mail-in ballots should be a freely available option for all.

        It doesn’t guarantee good results, but I feel it is the most straightforward way to rid ourselves of voter suppression campaigns, which I think are fundamentally evil.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            67 months ago

            It’s not much of a tax when it can be “paid” by sending a piece of paper through the mail, postage-paid.

            Australia does this. It works out very well.

            • @bob_lemon@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              37 months ago

              Hey, you’re talking to the country that has you actively apply to get a right to vote. The US is seemingly incapable of keeping track of their own citizens.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                27 months ago

                Give the IRS more funding and we will have little trouble keeping track of everyone.

                • @bob_lemon@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  27 months ago

                  Yeah, I just wrote another comment and noticed that the government probably has addresses because the IRS needs those to function.

                  • Flying Squid
                    link
                    fedilink
                    37 months ago

                    Do you think that’s how it works in Australia, where voting is compulsory? Or do you think they’ve found ways to accommodate for that?

    • @bob_lemon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      107 months ago

      I disagree with this approach without even touching the morality aspect.

      There should be no way to lose your voting rights once you are of age and a citizen of the US for the very simple reason of limiting the bureaucratic overhead of elections. If every citizen above the age of 18 can vote, you can just completely remove the ridiculous notion of “voter registration”.

      Just register everyone based on their legal address (which the government should have anyway because taxes). Just like a real democracy.

      • @rushaction@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        37 months ago

        I agree with this.

        Even people who make mistakes should be entitled to vote. Even while paying for their mistakes frankly. They may have lost their freedom, but they are still citizens of the Republic.

        The only compelling argument I know of is that voting in local elections is a mess because there would be counties that’d suffer from the over representation due to the location of the prisons. I would just consider those to be absentee voters myself, and they just keep the last address they had before going in or next if kin instead.

        Just my thoughts

      • I got a felony 14 years ago for running from a cop. He got a scratch on his hand and charged me with aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer. Bogus public defender didn’t even help try to fight for me and their charges stuck like glue.

      • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        217 months ago

        If the number of violent criminals in your society is enough to affect the outcome of an election, you’ve got much bigger problems. And if you take away the right to vote for violent crimes, politicians will attempt to redefine what “violent” means to disenfranchise more people.

      • @Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        What about white collars that steal so much money they literally ruin people’s lives?

        Please engage with me.