@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 5 months agoMagic πmander.xyzimagemessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up1702arrow-down17
arrow-up1695arrow-down1imageMagic πmander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 5 months agomessage-square63fedilink
minus-square@nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish19•5 months agoHonestly probably not that many more. My guess since I’m too lazy to do the math is less than 100.
minus-square@EvilHankVenture@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish23•5 months agoThe diameter of a hydrogen atom is over 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 plank lengths. So based on this post I have no idea.
minus-square@xthexder@l.sw0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish19•edit-25 months agoWell that’s only 26 more digits, so we’re probably good at 100 digits of pi. [citation needed]
minus-square@rasensprenger@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglish15•5 months agolog_10(size of observable universe / planck length) = 61.74… so like 63 digits of precision for everything are enough
minus-squareMalgaslinkfedilinkEnglish4•5 months agoThe width of a hydrogen atom is 3.1*10^24 Planck lengths. So, yeah, 65 digits of pi ought to do it.
Honestly probably not that many more. My guess since I’m too lazy to do the math is less than 100.
The diameter of a hydrogen atom is over 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 plank lengths.
So based on this post I have no idea.
Well that’s only 26 more digits, so we’re probably good at 100 digits of pi. [citation needed]
log_10(size of observable universe / planck length) = 61.74… so like 63 digits of precision for everything are enough
The width of a hydrogen atom is 3.1*10^24 Planck lengths. So, yeah, 65 digits of pi ought to do it.