@black0ut to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 5 months agoThey had a paid break, right?imagemessage-square60arrow-up11.14Karrow-down111
arrow-up11.13Karrow-down1imageThey had a paid break, right?@black0ut to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 5 months agomessage-square60
minus-square@herrvogel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink65•5 months agoManually optimizing the code I wrote in C, so that it runs noticeably slower and has all sorts of stupid bugs that weren’t there before. All in a good night’s work.
minus-square@Coreidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish7•5 months agoThat doesn’t sound like optimization.
minus-square@Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink17•5 months agoNo worries, he can optimize it later.
minus-square@TheGreenGolem@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish13•5 months agoPut a refactor ticket in the backlog. We’ll get to it eventually, right?
minus-square@marcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink6•5 months agoWell, I guess it’s either writing a device driver or that. And the device driver will always end-up with most code in C or Rust.
Manually optimizing the code I wrote in C, so that it runs noticeably slower and has all sorts of stupid bugs that weren’t there before. All in a good night’s work.
That doesn’t sound like optimization.
No worries, he can optimize it later.
Put a refactor ticket in the backlog. We’ll get to it eventually, right?
// TODO: fix this code
To you, maybe.
It’s just reverse optimizing!
Well, I guess it’s either writing a device driver or that.
And the device driver will always end-up with most code in C or Rust.