@Shatur@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml • 5 months agoAMD Quietly Funded A Drop-In CUDA Implementation Built On ROCm: It's Now Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1514arrow-down15cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zipstable_diffusion@lemmy.dbzer0.comprogramming@programming.devtechnology@lemmy.worldlinuxfurslinux@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldopensource@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up1509arrow-down1external-linkAMD Quietly Funded A Drop-In CUDA Implementation Built On ROCm: It's Now Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.com@Shatur@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml • 5 months agomessage-square22fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zipstable_diffusion@lemmy.dbzer0.comprogramming@programming.devtechnology@lemmy.worldlinuxfurslinux@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldopensource@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-squareAtemulinkfedilink42•5 months agoBy funding an API-compatible product, they are giving CUDA legitimacy as a common API. I can absolutely understand AMD not wanting a competitors invention and walled-off product to be anything resembling an industry standard.
minus-squareconciselyverboselinkfedilink-1•edit-25 months agoIt already has legitimacy. It’s their hardware that doesn’t, despite the decent raw flops and high memory.
By funding an API-compatible product, they are giving CUDA legitimacy as a common API. I can absolutely understand AMD not wanting a competitors invention and walled-off product to be anything resembling an industry standard.
It already has legitimacy. It’s their hardware that doesn’t, despite the decent raw flops and high memory.