• @KoboldCoterie
      link
      English
      524 months ago

      I’d take that 100% of the time over many of the other things our tax dollars pay for. Plus, it’s just a website with resources for fathers in general, not a whole site dedicated to dad jokes.

      • @ClopClopMcFuckwad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        214 months ago

        You’re not happy your tax dollars funded a 20yr war in Afghanistan that was ultimately lost in less than 2 weeks, and Gulf War 2: Iraqi Boogaloo The Hunt for Nonexistent WMDs?

        • squiblet
          link
          fedilink
          174 months ago

          Someone cited recently how much we were paying a year just for air conditioning in Afghanistan: $20 billion. Meanwhile we’re like “hey, maybe children shouldn’t be starving in school and forced to throw their lunch in the trash at the end of the line if they can’t pay for it, maybe states shouldn’t be sending parents to collections for a $90 kid’s lunch bill” and conservatives: WHO’S GONNA PAY FOR THAT??

        • Maven (famous)
          link
          fedilink
          104 months ago

          I’m very happy to give the government my money if it means improvements to the general population’s well being and improvements to social programs.

          That just… Doesn’t happen… So yeah

          • @mister_monster@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            That’s the point I’m making. Give me a government that I can see the taxes I pay benefitting myself and the others I share a government with and I won’t mind paying.

            War and dad joke websites aren’t my idea of money well spent.

          • @Willy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            I personally don’t use roads much, but I’m pretty sure my food gets to the grocery store that way. So big fan.

            • @surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              24 months ago

              Trivially silly opinions can be countered by trivially silly points. Yes.

              You don’t need to be creative every time some idiot repeats themselves. Though I guess it’s futile since they clearly won’t change their minds. So it’s more for anyone reading it who might think the original opinion makes any sense.

              • @mister_monster@monero.town
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -2
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                “I don’t want to pay taxes if they’re going to be used on stupid shit and bombing people” is not successfully countered with “roads”. Roads are obviously not stupid shit, if my taxes were only paying for stuff like roads I wouldn’t complain. Justify taking my money from me at gunpoint to pay for a dad joke website.

        • @callouscomic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -14 months ago

          The bottom half of wage earners pay zero federal income tax, and around 90% of federal income taxes are paid by the top 10%.

          Most people get more back than they had withheld all year. It’s most likely that these aren’t YOUR tax dollars, and if they are, YOUR contribution is likely microscopic.

          • @mister_monster@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -4
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I just don’t think taxes should be used to pay for a (likely overpriced) dad joke website man. There’s a perfectly good Lemmy community full of them that I get for free. This dad joke website is emblematic of a larger systemic problem, that most of the money we pay in taxes doesn’t actually benefit us in any tangible or measurable way.

            I also don’t want to contribute to bombing innocent people.

    • @tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      64 months ago

      Funding for the NRFC is provided through the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, which authorized the use of funds for “the development, promotion, and distribution of a media campaign to encourage the appropriate involvement of parents in the life of any child and specifically the issue of responsible fatherhood, and the development of a national clearinghouse to assist States and communities in efforts to promote and support marriage and responsible fatherhood.”

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deficit_Reduction_Act_of_2005

      Evidently it’s reducing deficits!

    • gregorum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This is also exactly why the NEA needs more grant money! Dad jokes are so lame!

    • @callouscomic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -44 months ago

      Well, the bottom half of wage earners pay zero federal income tax, and around 90% of federal income taxes are paid by the top 10%.

      Most people get more back than they had withheld all year. It’s most likely that these aren’t YOUR tax dollars, and if they are, YOUR contribution is likely microscopic.