@Jenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish • 4 months agoThis is the waylemmy.mlimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1106arrow-down138
arrow-up168arrow-down1imageThis is the waylemmy.ml@Jenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish • 4 months agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-square@ZeroEcks@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish18•4 months agoSometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit
minus-squareRustmilianlinkfedilinkEnglish0•edit-24 months agoTrue, but as a minimum you should be doing 200%. Also in a ideal scenario that 200% would be spread out to a lot more people then just 2.
minus-squarelittleblue✨linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoOP is showing 200% as their maximum. That’s the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼
minus-squarelittleblue✨linkfedilinkEnglish-1•4 months agoI’m not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗
Sometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit
True, but as a minimum you should be doing 200%.
Also in a ideal scenario that 200% would be spread out to a lot more people then just 2.
OP is showing 200% as their maximum. That’s the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼
No shit Sherlock 🫴
I’m not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗
I have no time for children.