@Jenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish • 4 months agoThis is the waylemmy.mlimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1106arrow-down138
arrow-up168arrow-down1imageThis is the waylemmy.ml@Jenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish • 4 months agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-square@blindsight@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoI looked it up, and qBittorrent can easily handle hundreds of torrents, apparently. I haven’t noticed any problems running 180-ish. I’ll probably try to keep it capped to 300 or something like that.
minus-square@Catsrules@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoDoes it matter how many files are in each torrent? I would think a 100 file torrent would be more intensive than a 3 file torrent.
minus-square@blindsight@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoI don’t think it has any effect at all, but I’m not an expert. It’s just sending data by request based on hashes and indices, isn’t it?
I looked it up, and qBittorrent can easily handle hundreds of torrents, apparently. I haven’t noticed any problems running 180-ish. I’ll probably try to keep it capped to 300 or something like that.
Does it matter how many files are in each torrent?
I would think a 100 file torrent would be more intensive than a 3 file torrent.
I don’t think it has any effect at all, but I’m not an expert. It’s just sending data by request based on hashes and indices, isn’t it?