• Hildegarde
    link
    fedilink
    20
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    They literally call their hydrogen car the future. Toyota has been trying, and is still avoiding making purely electric vehicles.

    Of all their models, Toyota only sells one EV in the US. Your aspirational assumptions about Toyota are nothing more than that.

    • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      -1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Not that there’s anything wrong with hydrogen cars, but they only add to my point.

      Dumb headlines focusing on extremely short-term “setbacks” ignoring how rapidly things have progressed and are progressing from just a decade ago.

    • @JoBo@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      -14 months ago

      Hydrogen is ‘pure’ electric.

      The issue with hydrogen is that it can be colours other than green. Green hydrogen is used to store the excess from renewables, and is more like a battery than a fuel. Other colours use fossil fuel, sometimes with a desperate plea to believe that they will actually capture the CO2 produced in making it.

      Green hydrogen is (potentially) a fantastic solution for transit, especially heavy transit… The jury is still out for cars but Toyota is one of the few taking that route and it’s important. Hydrogen is much lighter than batteries and refuelling is similar to petrol cars (ie quick).

      The problem to be solved is leaks. More than about 5% leakage cancels out the benefits because hydrogen makes methane hang around for longer.

      • @tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        84 months ago

        Green hydrogen is (potentially) a fantastic solution for transit, especially heavy transit.

        Batteries also aren’t gonna cut the mustard for most aviation, and my understanding is that a switch to hydrogen might be the way to go there.

      • Ooops
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        The jury is still out for cars

        The basic laws of thermodynamics beg to differ…