@gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 4 months agoPhilosophy rulesfeddit.deimagemessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1635arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1635arrow-down1imagePhilosophy rulesfeddit.de@gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 4 months agomessage-square58fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@readthemessage@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilink4•edit-24 months agoI thought the first link in philosophy was philosophy itself. Edit: I brainfarted while writing. What I meant is “I thought it would be even more interesting if the first link in philosophy was philosophy itself”.
minus-square@lugal@lemmy.mllinkfedilink6•4 months agoDo you mean this part? I don’t think that’s part of the article. From my understanding, the parentheses isn’t counted either.
minus-square@readthemessage@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilink4•4 months agoActually, no, but I meant something very different from what I wrote hehe I will edit my comment, thanks!
minus-square@lugal@lemmy.mllinkfedilink3•4 months agoI see. I think wikipedia either forbids links to itself or at least it is against every convention
minus-square@lugal@lemmy.mllinkfedilink3•4 months agoAnd I think a word is never twice linked but only the first time it appears. So if “clicking” will occur a second time, it won’t be clickable
I thought the first link in philosophy was philosophy itself.
Edit: I brainfarted while writing. What I meant is “I thought it would be even more interesting if the first link in philosophy was philosophy itself”.
Do you mean this part? I don’t think that’s part of the article. From my understanding, the parentheses isn’t counted either.
Actually, no, but I meant something very different from what I wrote hehe I will edit my comment, thanks!
I see. I think wikipedia either forbids links to itself or at least it is against every convention
Sounds reasonable
And I think a word is never twice linked but only the first time it appears. So if “clicking” will occur a second time, it won’t be clickable