I really don’t have a lot of background on cluster munitions; it only really came into my perception in response to the controversy over the US providing them to Ukraine. As I understand it, the controversy is because they often don’t all explode reliably, and unexploded munitions can then explode months or years later when civilians are occupying the territory, making it similar to the problems caused by landmines.

In an age where things like location trackers, radio transmitters, and other such local and long-range technology to locate objects are common place, what’s stopping the manufacturers of these munitions from simply putting some kind of device to facilitate tracking inside each individual explosive, to assist with detection and safe retrieval after a conflict? I get that nothing is a 100% effective solution, but it seems like it’d solve most of it.

Can someone with actual knowledge explain why this is still a problem we’re having?

  • KingSlareXIV
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    Well, technically it is a solved problem. Spain fielded electronically fused cluster bomblets that were disabled via a drained capacitor if not exploded in 5 minutes. This eliminated the possibility of live duds.

    This Espin system has since been removed from service. Not sure if there are any similar system currently in use.

    • @KoboldCoterieOP
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      That’s really interesting!

      This Espin system has since been removed from service.

      Do you know why this is? That seems like a functional and easy to implement solution.

      • KingSlareXIV
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        I believe is was pulled from service after Spain signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions.