• PonyOfWar
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        These NPCs would have to be written by people too. Otherwise you’d just get ChatGPT. Depending on complexity, it might even require more writing work.

        • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I like to think writers pour their souls into their work. LLMs are an amalgamation of other people’s work not the work of a person creating a character. Your argument is NPCs don’t have souls, obviously that’s an objective truth. I’m just saying give me the SOUL.

          • PonyOfWar
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Again, the character would still be written and defined by a human writer, pouring their soul into it just like they would a “dumb” NPC. I don’t see how that “soul” is lost by giving that human-written character the capability to naturally respond to language.

            • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              This is exhausting. I don’t think LLMs are capable of making a captivating enough character. Nothing I’ve seen thus far has led me to believe they have the capacity for creativity. That is what I consider soul.

              Which I believe people and only people can achieve at this moment in time.